Pages

14 October 2015

OROP - Analysis of Conflicting Perceptions



Being Informed is the Best Weapon.

Friday, 9 October 2015

http://sharad10525.blogspot.in/2015/10/orop-analysis-of-conflicting-percpetions.html

Full disclosure: 

1. Lt Gen V M Patil PVSM, AVSM (retd), President Akhil Bharatiya Poorva Sainik Seva Parishad (ABPSSP) facilitated a meeting with the Hon'ble Raksha Mantri.

2. This blog author presented the subsequent analysis based on facts & documents (sources as cited below) to the Hon'ble Raksha Mantri ((in hard copy) on 8th October 2015 at 8 am and it was discussed thoroughly. Further developments are awaited. 

3. This blog author made the presentation in his personal capacity and not as a member of any ESM organisation. 

One Rank One Pension (OROP) Issue
Analysis of Conflicting Perceptions & Suggestions for Resolution

References: -


(a) Koshiyari Committee Report of December 2011,

(b) MoD OM No. 17 (4)/2008 (2)/D (Pen/Pol) dated 12.11.2008,

(c) SAI (SNI/SAFI) No. 1/S/2008 and 2/S/2008,
(d) MoD Resolution No. 1 (E) dated 30.8.2008

(e) DP & PW OM F No. 38/37/08 – P & PW (A). Part II dated 3.10.2008 concerning revision of  provisions regulating pension/gratuity/commutation of pension/family pension/disability   pension/ex-gratia lump sum compensations,

(f) DP & PW OM No. 38/37/08 – P & PW (A). pt I dated 14.10.2008, - revised pension based on  revised pay bands and grade pay for posts carrying present scales as per Sixth Central Pay Commission,

(g) Defence Pension Regulations 2008 and Rules for Army, Navy & Air Force available on the PCDA (P) Website,

h) Judgements of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in D. S. Nakara & Others Vs UoI (1982), UoI & Anr Vs Maj Gen S. P. S. Vains & Another (2009), A. N. Sachdeva (deceased) & Others Vs Maharishi Dayanand University (MDU) (August 2015),

(j) PCDA (P) Circular Nos 500, 501, 547 and 548,

(k) Speech of Defence Minister apropos One Rank One Pension (OROP) on 5th September 2015,

(l) Letter from Maj Gen Satbir Singh (retd) to Defence Minister dated 18th September 2015.


List of Appendices: -

A - Tables for Pay & Pension w.e.f 1.1.2006 for Officers (Annexure A of PCDA (P) Circular 500)


B- Tables for Pay & Pension w.e.f 1.1.2006 for ORs & JCOs (Tables from PCDA (P) Circular 501)








Full Disclosure on shortcomings of this paper: - This analysis ishandicapped from being completely objective due to non-availability of the following: -






(a) Minutes of meetings of Joint Working Group (JWG) constituted by the MoD on 24th April 2014 culminating with a presentation to then Defence-cum-Finance Minister on 12th June 2014, including the methodology adopted by CGDA to arrive at the cost of implementing OROP,






(b) Minutes of meetings that IESM, IESL and other ESM organisations had with the Govt and the decisions taken/consensus arrived at/differences of opinion recorded and placed in the public domain,






(c) Persistent denial of information on OROP by CPIO and by Appellate Authority, Deptt of Ex-Servicemens’ Welfare on the grounds that the information is sensitive/classified,






(d) Denial of information by CPIO, O/o CGDA on the grounds that MoD has ordered that the information is MOST CONFIDENTIAL and should not be disclosed, and






(e) MoD (D – Pay/Services and Deptt of Ex- Servicemen Welfare), MoF (Deptt of Expenditure) denying information on the Cabinet Secretary Committee Report of 2012 for recommending OROP (and NFU) to be referred to the 7th Central Pay Commission.






Basis & Aim for this paper






1. The Defence Minister’s announcement of 5th September 2015 on implementation of OROP vis-à-vis differences of opinion/perception/interpretation by Maj Gen Satbir Singh (retd) and Governing Body of IESM/UFESM is the basis of this paper/presentation. The aim is to provide a logical analysis, and practical solutions. 






5 Yearly Review vis-à-vis Annual Review






2. IESM and others quote the Koshiyari Committee Report. Therein it is recorded






2.1. At Para 6.4 on Page 5 of the Report, the Army’s representative agreed to a 5 yearly enhancement, and included the family pensioners.






2.2. At Para 6.5 on Page 5, the Air Force representative agreed.






2.3. At Para 6.6 on Page 5, the Naval representative did not mention anything relevant to this point.






3. What is the aim for either a five yearly or an annual equalisation or review? Is it to ensure that past pensioners with the same rank and same number of years of service get the same pension with one retiring in 2014 or 2015 or 2016? And pension of ESM senior in rank, or with certain years of service is not lesser than a junior’s?






4. For this the Implementation Order has to be precisely worded. Then once in 5 years or annual Review or Equalisation will not be needed in a majority of cases. The few cases that would need rationalisation are, for example, of two course-mates commissioned on the same date (say 01 Jul 1980). Course-mate A retires on 30th June 2013 in the rank of Lt Col. He does not get the 3% increment, whereas another course-mate B retires in the rank of Lt Col on 31st July 2013 and gets the increment though both have retired in the same calendar year 2013. These kinds of cases will need review only if this aspect is not covered in the implementation order. If all, like the former (who retired one day before the increment was falling due), are given the benefit of the increment, it will have a financial effect of 0.85% or Rs 185 crore.






5. To emphasise the point, most importantly, since the uniform pension for the same rank and qualifying service criteria is to be fulfilled, the review and correction for all such ESM can be done at the initiation of the OROP scheme. It must be emphasised that the “5 yearly review means next in 2018, and we will miss 7th CPC recommendations” is the kind of canard spread by the ultracrepidarists (defined as habit of giving opinions & advice on matters outside one’s knowledge or competence) in the print and electronic media.






Analysis:






6. In a steady state there will not be changes in the tables below until the implementation of the 7th CPC recommendations as approved by the Govt. (Please refer to tables at Appendix A for Officer ESM, Appendix B for Other Than Officers ESM).






Officer ESM






7. The tables clearly show that


7.1. In a steady state (same rank, same years of qualifying service), pension need not be revised (equalised) every year.






7.2. For the same rank and same years of service, Officers promoted earlier will draw the same pay and pension as those promoted after them. So the apprehension that a junior ranked ESM or a same rank but lesser QS ESM will draw more in without basis, obviating the need for an annual review.






7.3. Once pension is reset on 1.7.2014 thereafter no change will take place except on the implementation of the recommendations of the 7th CPC.






Other than Officer ESM (without addition of Group X Pay where applicable)






8. In a steady state there will not be changes in the tables below until the implementation of the 7th CPC recommendations as approved by the Govt.






8.1. Subedar Majors/MCPOs-I/Master Warrant Officers will also have similar situation as for the Sub/MCPO-II/WO.






8.2. The current top of scale pension (in Circular 501) is higher than the pay and pension drawn by the current retirees. Therefore, JCOs and equivalents are already OROP compliant and may benefit minimally, if and when OROP is implemented.






8.3. Havildar/Petty Officer)Sargent current retirees are drawing higher last pay drawn, consequently higher pension than the top of the scale based pension.






8.4. However, the senior will continue to get higher pay and pension than all juniors who are promoted to this rank at a later date.






8.5. Thus, once pay is re-set on a date, say 01 Jul 2014, then there will not be any change in pension of this rank till the next pay commission






Suggested Solution (Please also read Average Pensions below): -





9. Using similar methodology as used to formulate Circulars 500 (for retired officers) and 501 (for retired JCOs & ORs) to work out the solutions to the issue above.





10. Include numerical illustrations in the Implementation Order similar to the ones in SAI (SNI, SAFI) of 2008 to make ESM understand why any review would only add to delays in implementing OROP at the earliest.


Effective Date 01 Jul 2014 vis-à-vis 01 Apr 2014


11. ESM would have to be placed at the levels of pension that any retiree with the same (uniform) service and same rank would draw on 01 Jul 2013, which was the date of last increment. For example (amounts used are for illustrative purposes only: -




Particulars 


w.e.f 01 Apr 2014 


w.e.f to 01 Jul 2014 



Rank Lt Col 


20 years service 


20 years service 



Pay in the Pay Band (Rs) 


45000


(includes 3% increment on 01 Jul 2013) 


43410







Grade Pay (Rs) 


8000 


8000 



M S P (Rs) 


6000 


6000 



Increment 


Nil - As already drawn on 01 Jul 2013 


on 01 Jul 2014 1590 



Total emoluments 


59000 


59000 



Pension 


29500 


29500 







12. Analysis: - Provide illustration/numerical examples in the implementation order.


Calendar Year 2013 vis-à-vis Financial Year 2013-4






13. The Govt has indicated that the base year for the purpose of OROP would be the calendar year 2013. This does not seem to be an unacceptable proposition. The reason is that after 01 Jul 13 the pension would include the increment of the year 2013.


14. The Services/ Ex-servicemen have demanded 01 Apr 2014 as the base date but pay, and pension does not change after taking into account the increment of 01 Jul 2013. To that extent base year commencing 01 Apr 14 should not make any material difference. The only aberration is, again, that of course mates retiring on two different days, one on 30 Jun 13 the other on 31 Jul 13 having a difference in pay and pension. But these odd cases, which may not be numerous to deserve too much attention for determining macro policy.


15. In the heat and dust, it is forgotten that all Central Pay Commission recommendations are made effective 1st January (1986, 1996, 2006) i.e beginning of the calendar year.


16. Analysis: - ESM will not be deprived of OROP because the increment due on 1st July 2013 will be effective and paid whether it is calendar year or financial year.


Average Pension vis-à-vis Top of the Scale (Average Pension vis-à-vis Actual Pay/Pension Drawn)


17. Average of pension will involve checking records of 30 lakh ESM & widows or NoK. Reasons are given below.






17.1. Till the 1.1.2006, the following weightages were provided for calculating pension benefits (MoD letter dated 3rd February 1998) for all retiring from the Defence Forces: -




Rank 


Weightage Services


(years) 


Weightage MNS


(years) 



Lieutenant 




Nil 



Captain 







Major 







Lt Colonel (TS) 







Lt Colonel (Select) 







Brigadier 







General Officers 







Below Commissioned Rank 



Sepoy 


10 (+2 from 17.1.2013) 





Naik 


8 (+2 from 17.1.2013) 





Havildar 


6 (+2 from 17.1.2013 ) 





JCO 











17.2. After the implementation of the 6th CPC, wherein the qualifying service for full pensions for officers was reduced to 20 years, the weightage was removed [Resolution No. 38/37/08-P & PW (A) dated 29th August 2008] for Officers, except for commissioned officers who retired or were invalided out of service between 1.1.2006 and 1.9.2008. On the other hand, weightage stands withdrawn for PBOR w.e.f 1.1.2006 (Para 5.1.3 of MoD No. 71(4)/2008(2)/Pen/Pol) dated 12th November 2008.






Note: Weightages for JCOs/ORs has been withdrawn for retirees from 1.1.2006 if they are drawing pension at last pay drawn. In case it is beneficial that pension at the notional top is higher, the same can be drawn and in such cases the weightage will apply.





17.3. Further, MoD letter No. 1(13)/2012/D (Pen/Pol) dated 17.1. 2013 (PCDA Circular 501) also states as follows: -






2……The Committee of Secretaries recommended






2.1. The pension of pre-1.1.2006 JCO/OR pensioners may be determined on the basis of notional maximum for the ranks and groups across the three Services, and






2.2. Current weightage in qualifying service of Sepoy, Naik and Havildar may be increased by 2 years.






18. Another factor that will come into consideration is at Para 2 and 3 of MoD letter No. 1(04)/2015 (II) – D (Pen/Pol) dated 3.9.2015 (PCDA Circular 547) which states:






……..2. Now, after the issue of GoI, Ministry of Personnel, PG & Pensioners, Department of Pensioners and Pensioners’ Welfare OM No. 38/37/08-P & PW (A) dated 30.7.2015, it is decided that with effect from 1.1.2006 pension/family pension of Pre-2006 JCOs/ORs Pensioners/family pensioners shall be determined as fifty and thirty percent respectively of the minimum of the fitment table for the rank in the revised pay band as indicated under fitment tables annexed with 1/S/2008…..





3. However, in case, the consolidated pension/family pension calculated as per Para 4.1. of this Ministry’s letter No. 17 (4)/2008 (1)/D (pen/Pol) dated 11.11.2008 is higher than the pension/family pension calculated in the manner indicated above, the same (higher consolidated pension/family pension) will continue to be treated as basic pension/family pension. However, where revised pension in terms of GoI, MoD letter No. PC -10 (1)/2009 – D (Pen/Pol) dated 8.3.2010 and No. 1 (13)/2012/D (Pen/Pol) dated 17.1.2013 is higher than the rate indicated in annexure attached with this letter then the same will continue to be treated as basic pension/family pension from 1.7.2007 and 24.9.2012.






19. Table below indicates the differences for some ranks and Qualifying Service: -








QS (X Gp) 


Sepoy 


Naik 


Havildar 


Naib Subedar 



Circular No. 


501 


547 


501 


547 


501 


547 


501 


547 



15 


5961 


4637 


5961 


4637 


6374 


4637 


6976 


5558 



20 


6441 


5564 


7065 


5564 


7760 


5564 


8720 


6947 



25 


6441 


5564 


7606 


5841 


8868 


6328 


10464 


8337 







20. Under the circumstances, the proposed average pension for OROP is likely to be an administrative night mare. Reports that tenure in the rank tables will add to he nightmare as many promotions are based on vacancies arising out of higher rank due to promotions, pre-mature releases, medical unfitness, restoration of medical fitness for promotion from original date of being selected for promotion etc. No clarity on whether it will be a simple mean, a simple average, or a weighted mean (apropos till 1.1.2006 weightage was provided to Defence Personnel for pension purposes). There is no clarity on who will determine minimum and maximum pension for the calendar year 2013, with weightage and without. If determined, then who verifiescase by case.






21. The easier way is to tabulate the pay drawn for each rank in each year of qualifying service. The figure so determined divided by 2 will provide the amount of pension. This table is easy to comprehend and is in sync with the current table in vogue since 24 Sep 12 for pension. In any case if average method is applied the financial impact cannot be Rs 8296 Cr as those above the average do not benefit, and there will be no change for JCO’s, but only Havildars and equivalent would get an increase in pension amount due to notional top of the scale.






OROP Not Applicable for Pre-Mature Released Defence Forces Personnel vis-à-vis OROP applicable for all






22. Government of India has promulgated the definition of Ex-Servicemen issued on 4th October 2012 by DOP & T which states, inter alia

“(c) An ‘ex-serviceman’ means a person –


(i) Who has served in any rank whether as a combatant or non-combatant in the Regular Army, Navy and Air Force of the Indian Union, and 


(a) Who either has been retired or relieved or discharged from such service whether at his own request or being relieved by the employer after earning his or her pension; or 


(b) Who has been relieved from such service on medical grounds attributable to military service or circumstances beyond his control and awarded medical or other disability pension; or


(c) Who has been released from such service as a result of reduction in establishment;”……..(emphasis supplied)






23. Army, Navy, Air Force Pensions Regulations 2008 are statutory. These Regulations (separately for Army, Air Force, and Navy, in that order) are available on the PCDA (P) website. They are too voluminous to reproduce here. Suggested reading are






23.1. Part I- Containing Regulations regulating the pensionary awards of personnel of the Regular Army, the Defence Security Corps, Emergency/Short Service Commissioned Officer and the Territorial Army, especially






Section 1 – Para 4 – Definitions;






Para 5 – Types of Pensions;






Para 8 – Pension subject to future good conduct;






Section 2 – Para 17 and notes there under;






Para 19 






23.2. Part II- Regulations relating to pension procedure affecting the personnel whose pensions are regulated by the Regulations in Part I.






24. The Constitution Bench of the Honourable Supreme Court in the D S Nakara case in 1982 averred, inter alia,






“In the instant case, the petitioners do not challenge, but seek the benefit of the liberalised pension scheme. Their grievance is of the denial to them of the same by arbitrary introduction of words of limitation. ………………... If the event is certain but its occurrence at a point of time is considered wholly irrelevant and arbitrarily selected having an undesirable effect of dividing a homogeneous class and of introducing discrimination, the same can be easily severed and set aside. It is therefore just and proper that the words introducing the arbitrary fortuitous circumstance which are vulnerable as denying equality be severed and struck down.”






25. The Honourable Court ruled in the Maj Gen S P Vains case, inter alia,






“…..The case of the respondents however, was that in view of the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in D.S. Nakara and others vs. Union of India (1983) 1 SCC 305, the fixation of a cut-off date as a result of which equals were treated as unequals, was wholly arbitrary and had been rightly interfered with by the High Court. One of the questions posed in the aforesaid decision was whether a class of pensioners could be divided for the purpose of entitlement and payment of pension…… The question was answered by the Constitution Bench holding that such division being both arbitrary and unprincipled the classification did not stand the test of Article 14.


xxxx xxxx xxxx 






26. The question regarding creation of different classes within the same cadre on the basis of the doctrine of intelligible differentia having nexus with the object to be achieved, has fallen for consideration at various intervals for the High Courts as well as this Court, over the years…… In the context of that case, which is similar to that of the instant case, it was held that Article 14 of the Constitution had been wholly violated, inasmuch as, the Pension Rules being statutory in character, the amended Rules, specifying a cut off date resulted in differential and discriminatory treatment of equals. ………… The division which classified pensioners into two classes was held to be artificial and arbitrary and not based on any rational principle and whatever principle, if there was any, had not only no nexus to the objects sought to be achieved by amending the Pension Rules, but was counter productive and ran counter to the very object of the pension scheme. It was ultimately held that the classification did not satisfy the test of Article 14 of the Constitution (emphasis supplied).


Suggestion Solution: 






26. It would be advisable for the Government to delete the VRS/PMR clause unless the Government wishes to






26.1. Further mar its image as being anti – Armed Forces Veterans, and/or






26.2. Waste time of the Courts, Law Officers and itself in fighting and losing cases.






Govt’s Constitution of Single member Judicial Commission


Vis-à-vis IESM’s 5 member Committee


27. If proposal is to appoint a Commission of one member or a Committee of 3 to 5 members, one of the members should be from Finance and one an ESM unaffected by the OROP scheme. This will make the report of the Commission/Committee more likely to be acceptable and would invite far less strictures/observation then if the committee does not have any finance representative.


Jai Hind


* * * * * 


Appendix A


(Refers to Para 6)


Officers






[* Amounts are taken from Annexure A of PCDA Circular No. 500 dated 17.1.2013.]






Majors/Lieutenant Commanders/Squadron Leaders








Qualifying


Service (QS) 


Pay in Pay Band 


GP 


MSP 


Increment in Jul 


Total


B+C+D


(add E for additional year of QS) 


Pension 


Pension drawn* 






















21630 






















6600 






















6000 


850 


34230 


17115 







22480 


880 


35080 


17540 







23360 


900 


35960 


17980 





10 


24260 


930 


36860 


18430 


9930 



11 


25190 


960 


37790 


18895 


10482 



12 


26150 


990 


38750 


19375 


11034 



13 


27140 


1020 


39740 


19870 


11585 



14 


28160 


1050 


40760 


20380 


12317 



15 


29210 


1080 


41810 


20905 


12689 



16 


30290 


1110 


42890 


21445 


13240 







Lt Colonels (Sel)/Commanders/Wing Commanders








Qualifying


Service


(QS) 


Pay in Pay Band 


GP 


MSP 


Increment in Jul 


Total


B+C+D


(add E for additional year of QS) 


Pension 


Pension drawn* 




















14 


37400 


















8000 


















6000 


1370 


51400 


25700 


16716 



15 


38770 


1410 


52770 


26385 


17510 



16 


40180 


1450 


54180 


27090 


18306 



17 


41630 


1490 


55630 


27815 


19102 



18 


43120 


1540 


57120 


28560 


19898 



19 


44660 


1580 


58660 


29330 


20894 



20 


46240 


1630 


60240 


30120 


21490 



21 


47870 


1680 


61870 


30395 


22286 



22 


49550 


1730 


63550 


31775 


23082 



23 


51280 


1780 


65280 


32640 


23878 







Colonels/Captains/Group Captains








Qualifying Service 


Pay in Pay Band 


GP 


MSP 


Increment in Jul 


Total


B+C+D


(add E for additional year of QS ) 


Pension 


Pension drawn* 




















18 


43120 






















8700 






















6000 


1560 


57820 


28910 


21057 



19 


44680 


1610 


59380 


29690 


21900 



20 


46290 


1650 


60990 


30495 


22742 



21 


47940 


1700 


62640 


31320 


23584 



22 


49640 


1750 


64340 


32170 


24426 



23 


51390 


1810 


66090 


33045 


25269 



24 


53200 


1860 


67900 


33950 


26111 



25 


55060 


1920 


69760 


34880 


26953 



26 


56980 


1970 


71680 


35840 


27795 



27 


58950 


2030 


73650 


36825 


27795 







Brigadiers/Commodores/Air Commodores








Qualifying Service


(Years) 


Pay in Pay Band 


GP 


MSP 


Increment in Jul 


Total


B+C+D


(add E for additional year of QS ) 


Pension 


Pension drawn* 




















26 


53220 






















8900 






















6000 


1870 


68120 


34060 


27795 



27 


55090 


1920 


69990 


34994 


28262 



28 


57010 


1980 


71910 


35955 


29145 



29 


58990 


2040 


73890 


36945 


29145 



30 


61030 


2100 


75930 


37965 


29145 



31 


63130 


2160 


78030 


39015 


29145 



32 


65290 


2230 


80190 


40095 


29145 



33 


67000 


2280 


81900 


40950 


29145 



34 


67000 


2280 


81900 


40950 


29145 



35 


67000 


2280 


81900 


40950 


29145 







Major Generals/Rear Admirals/Air Vice Marshals








Qualifying Service


(Years) 


Pay in Pay Band 


GP 


MSP 


Increment in Jul 


Total


B+C+D


(add E for additional year of QS ) 


Pension 


Pension drawn* 




















30 


61090 






10000 






Nil 


2140 


71090 


35545 


31250 



31 


63230 


2200 


73230 


36615 


31250 



32 


65430 


2270 


75430 


37715 


31250 



33 


67000 


Nil 


77000 


38500 


31250 



34 


67000 


Nil 


77000 


38500 


31250 



35 


67000 


Nil 


77000 


38500 


31250 



36 


67000 


Nil 


77000 


38500 


31250 



37 


67000 


Nil 


77000 


38500 


31250 











[Note: - There are current cases shown above wherein Brigadiers & equivalents are earning PB 4+ GP + MSP = Rs 81900 and their pension is Rs 40950! Army Cdrs/VCOAS & equivalents are paid Rs 80000 (fixed) pm and their pension is Rs 40000 pm. Apex Scale??]


Appendix B


(Refers to Para 6)


Other Ranks






Notes: 1. ‘X’ Group Pay of Rs 1400 p.m is not added in arriving at total in Column F.


2. Column H indicates the pension for X Group.


3. Amounts indicated in Column H are from PCDA Circular No. 501 dated 17.1.2013.


Naik/Leading Seaman/Corporal








QS 


Pay in PB 


GP 


MSP 


Increment 


Total 


Pension 


Pension drawn* 

















H (X Gp) 





7650 


2400 


2000 


290 


11650 


5825 







7940 


300 


11940 


5970 







8240 


310 


12240 


6120 







8550 


320 


12550 


6275 





10 


8870 


330 


12870 


6435 





11 


9200 


340 


13200 


6600 





12 


9540 


350 


13540 


6770 





13 


9890 


360 


13890 


6945 





14 


10250 


370 


14250 


7125 





15 


10620 


380 


14620 


7310 


5961 



16 


11000 


390 


15000 


7500 


6182 



17 


11390 


410 


15390 


7695 


6402 



18 


11800 


420 


15800 


7900 


6623 



19 


12220 


430 


16220 


8110 


6844 



20 


12650 


440 


16650 


8325 


7065 



21 


13090 


460 


17090 


8545 


7271 



22 


13550 


470 


17550 


8775 


7506 



Havildar/Petty Officer/Sergeant








QS 


Pay in PB 


GP 


MSP 


Increment 


Total 


Pension 


Pension drawn* 




















14 


9040 


























2800 


























2000 


360 


13480 


6920 





15 


9400 


370 


14200 


7100 


6374 



16 


9770 


380 


14570 


7285 


6651 



17 


10150 


390 


14950 


7475 


6929 



18 


10540 


400 


15340 


7670 


7206 



19 


10940 


420 


15740 


7870 


7483 



20 


11360 


430 


16160 


8080 


7760 



21 


11790 


440 


16590 


8295 


8037 



22 


12230 


450 


17030 


8515 


8314 



23 


12680 


470 


17480 


8740 


8591 



24 


13150 


480 


17950 


8975 


8868 



25 


13630 


500 


18430 


9215 


8868 



26 


14130 


510 


18930 


9465 


8868 



27 


14640 


530 


19440 


9720 


8868 



28 


15170 


540 


19970 


9985 


9145 







Naib Subedar (Nb Sub)/Chief Petty Officer (CPO)/Junior Warrant Officer (JWO)








QS 


Pay in PB 


GP 


MSP 


Increment






Total






Pension 


Pension drawn* 




















19 


10520 


4200 


2000 


450 


16720 


8360 


8371 



20 


10970 


4200 


2000 


460 


17170 


8585 


8720 



21 


11430 


4200 


2000 


470 


17630 


8815 


9089 



22 


11900 


4200 


2000 


490 


18100 


9050 


9418 



23 


12390 


4200 


2000 


500 


18590 


9295 


9787 



24 


12890 


4200 


2000 


520 


19090 


9545 


10115 



25 


13410 


4200 


2000 


530 


19610 


9805 


10464 



26 


13940 


4200 


2000 


550 


20140 


10070 


10813 



27 


14490 


4200 


2000 


560 


20690 


10345 


11336 



28 


15050 


4200 


2000 


580 


21250 


10625 


11510 







Subedar/Master CPO II/Warrant Officer








QS 


Pay in PB 


GP 


MSP 


Increment 


Total 


Pension 


Pension drawn* 




















24 


12280 


4600 


2000 


510 


18880 


9440 


11517 



25 


12790 


4600 


2000 


530 


19390 


9695 


11914 



26 


13320 


4600 


2000 


540 


19920 


9960 


12510 



27 


13860 


4600 


2000 


560 


20460 


10230 


12708 



28 


14420 


4600 


2000 


570 


21020 


10510 


13105 



29 


14990 


4600 


2000 


590 


21590 


10795 


13105 



30 


15580 


4600 


2000 


610 


22180 


11090 


13105 



31 


16190 


4600 


2000 


630 


22790 


11395 


13105 



32 


16820 


4600 


2000 


650 


23420 


11710 


13105 



33 


17470 


4600 


2000 


670 


24070 


12035 


13105 



No comments:

Post a Comment