Chad de Guzman
Since Donald Trump formally announced plans for the shield in May—after ordering the “Iron Dome for America” a week into his second term—the Pentagon has tried to keep discussion of its development under wraps, including by reportedly banning officials from discussing it at a military-industrial conference earlier this month and asking organizers to keep it off the general agenda, according to Politico. Organizers said they were told to keep discussion of the Golden Dome to a specific, closed-to-the-press summit on the sidelines of the main conference.
The Atlantic’s Tom Nichols, who expressed doubts over the viability of the Golden Dome, described the choice to “go silent” on the ambitious and expensive undertaking, at the 2025 Space and Missile Defense Symposium in Huntsville, Ala., which “is exactly the kind of place where the government can tell its story and get science, industry, and the military on the same page,” as “strange.”
Even former military officials have been baffled by the clamp down. “We gotta be able to talk about it,” Ret. Army Lt. Gen. Daniel Karbler, who served as commander of the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command from 2019-2024, told the Washington Times.
“We have to be able to share with the American public what we are intending to do with Golden Dome for America. We gotta share with the industry what the architecture is going to look like. We have to share with the services what is going to be called upon for their forces,” said Karbler. “We have gotta do a good job at just communicating.”
A Defense Department official told media in a statement that “it would be imprudent for the Department to release further information on this program during these early stages,” citing “operational security.” The Washington Times theorized that the secrecy “could be explained by spying concerns,” particularly from geopolitical rivals like Russia and China.
No comments:
Post a Comment