14 January 2026

Lawrence’s Shadow: How Afghan Resistance Can Topple the Taliban

Robert D. Billard, Jr.

Four years after the Taliban’s return to power, Afghanistan’s regime faces deepening economic collapse, ethnic alienation, and persistent internal and external pressures. The United States now possesses an ideal opportunity to subvert Taliban rule and deny Afghanistan’s further usage as a terrorist safe haven. While the past quarter-century has seen overt investment into Counter Insurgency Operations, this article explains how the United States can enable and empower a current insurgency to achieve strategic goals that went unrealized during 20 years of sustained ground operations. 

Drawing directly on T.E. Lawrence’s “Twenty-Seven Articles,” this article examines how fragmented anti-Taliban forces could adopt a mobility-focused, population-centric campaign to exploit these vulnerabilities and progressively erode Taliban control. It outlines a practical strategy built on unified command, indirect warfare, parallel governance, and targeted information operations. The article then specifies low-footprint Western support measures – such as intelligence sharing, precision weapons, exile training, and deniable funding – that could enable victory without reintroducing conventional forces. Finally, it addresses proliferation risks, Pakistani reactions, and moral hazards, concluding that calibrated external enablement offers the most viable path to deny the Taliban permanent consolidation.

China’s BYD Displaces Tesla as the Global Leader of EVs

Brian C. Black

BYD’s rise reflects China’s scale, pricing power, and policy coherence, while Tesla’s slowdown exposes how US political backlash is reshaping the global EV race.

China’s BYD has overtaken Elon Musk’s Tesla as the world’s biggest seller of electric vehicles (EVs), marking the first time it has outpaced its American rival in annual sales.

This startling shift reflects growth and development at BYD; however, it also grows from changes for Tesla, the previous leader. Tesla car sales dropped by nearly nine percent in 2025, to 1.64 million vehicles worldwide. It marks the second consecutive year of falling car deliveries for the company. Those figures placed Tesla behind BYD, which said recently that sales of its battery-powered cars rose last year by almost 28 percent to more than 2.25 million.

All the weapons China doesn’t want Taiwan to have

Grant Newsham

China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has all the pieces needed for an assault on Taiwan utilizing air, naval and ground forces, along with missiles, electronic and cyber weaponry. And it has been rehearsing, not exercising, rehearsing.

The report doesn’t much mention the Chinese “fifth column” in place in Taiwan or the ongoing subversion – “entropic warfare” – aimed at breaking apart Taiwan’s society and the citizenry’s will to resist a Chinese invasion.

However, this focus on Chinese military capabilities refers to what China can do to Taiwan. As important is what Taiwan can do to China, especially to a PLA invasion force coming across the Taiwan Strait.

China hacked email systems of US congressional committee staff

Demetri Sevastopulo

China has hacked the emails used by congressional staff on powerful committees in the US House of Representatives, as part of a massive cyber espionage campaign known as Salt Typhoon.

Chinese intelligence accessed email systems used by some staffers on the House China committee in addition to aides on the foreign affairs committee, intelligence committee and armed services committee, according to people familiar with the attack. The intrusions were detected in December.

The attacks are the latest element of an ongoing cyber campaign against US communication networks by the Ministry of State Security, China’s intelligence service. One person familiar with the attack said it was unclear if the MSS had accessed lawmakers’ emails.

A Networked Leapfrog Strategy to Recapture Technology Leadership

Michael J. Mazarr

It is now widely agreed that the contest for leadership in frontier scientific and technological progress is one of the foremost elements — if not the centerpiece — of the U.S.-China rivalry. China's leadership appears to believe that science and technology offer the primary engines of development and innovation that will realize its goals of national rejuvenation and is investing massively across many areas. After years of taking a largely hands-off approach to this contest, at least from a government standpoint, the United States now appreciates the significance of the contest for leadership in science and technology as foundational to the economic and national security aspects of the rivalry and has begun responding to the Chinese effort with investments, policies, and export controls of its own.

The author proposes a bold strategy for the United States to regain competitive advantage: large-scale, high-risk experiments targeting transformative technological breakthroughs. Rather than competing head-on with China's incremental innovations, the strategy advocates for leapfrogging current-generation technologies to create entirely new paradigms in such areas as semiconductors, renewable energy, advanced manufacturing, and health care diagnostics. It emphasizes multilateral collaboration with other leading industrial democracies to pool resources, talent, and influence, fostering a shared ecosystem of innovation.

The Taiwan ‘Idiocy’: Why Game Theory Rules Out A 2027 Invasion


While the Pentagon warns of a looming 2027 conflict, the strategic “payoff matrix” tells a different story. From coastal vulnerability to the “Game of Chicken” with Japan, here is why Beijing is playing a much longer—and more cautious—game.

The drumbeat of war in the Taiwan Strait has become a staple of Western geopolitical forecasting. With military drills intensifying and the 2027 “Davidson Window” approaching, the narrative seems set: China is preparing for a historic military gambit.

But according to Professor Djangu Chin, a Yale-educated game theory expert based in Beijing, this narrative fails the test of rational logic. To Chin, the idea of a near-term invasion isn’t just unlikely—it is “idiocy.”

Iran’s new age of revolutions

Kasra Aarabi and Saeid Golkar

‘This country will not be fixed until we bury the mullahs.’ This slogan captures the prevailing mood on Iran’s streets today. What began as demonstrations triggered by the rapid devaluation of the Iranian rial has quickly evolved into open unrest against the regime. Nationwide protests have now entered their ninth day with no sign of de-escalation, spreading well beyond major urban centres into rural towns and villages that were long considered regime strongholds. More than 108 cities and towns have experienced protests, with particularly intense mobilisation in Ilam, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces – regions once viewed as pillars of the Islamic Republic’s social base.

In turn, the regime has resorted to its usual tactics, unleashing a brutal wave of suppression against unarmed protestors. This includes slowing down the internet, deploying its domestic militia – the Basij – on the streets, and mass beatings and arrests. More than 40 civilians have been killed so far, with thousands detained. This violent crackdown – spearheaded by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) – has even seen the regime’s security forces break into hospitals to kidnap and detain wounded protestors.

Iran Is Cut Off From Internet as Protests Calling for Regime Change Intensify

Farnaz Fassihi Pranav Baskar and Sanam Mahoozi

Iran plunged into an internet blackout on Thursday, monitoring groups said, as nationwide protests demanding the ouster of the Islamic government spread to multiple cities and grew in size, according to witnesses.

The internet shutdown came a day after the heads of Iran’s judiciary and its security services said they would take tough measures against anyone protesting. But the threats did not deter demonstrators.

In telephone interviews, more than a dozen witnesses said that they saw large crowds forming on Thursday night in neighborhoods across Tehran, the capital, and in cities around Iran, including Mashhad, Bushehr, Shiraz and Isfahan. They said the crowds were diverse, with men and women, young and old. The people interviewed inside Iran asked that their names not be published out of fear of retribution.

Eight Military Takeaways from the Maduro Raid

Patrick Sullivan and John Amble

Despite steadily heightening tensions, heated rhetoric, US strikes against alleged drug trafficking boats, and a buildup of US forces near Venezuela, news of the successful mission to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro still surprised the world. Much of the discussion since has focused on the geopolitical stakes, questions of international law, and the domestic political context. Such discussion will undoubtedly continue.

But apart from these, there is also a military lens through which to examine Operation Absolute Resolve. What can we learn from the raid, which from a purely operational perspective was stunningly successful? How should we understand the operation in the context of the United States’ strategic global military rivalry with Russia and China? And how do the capabilities on display during the few hours in Caracas figure in the context of a potential large-scale conflict with a peer adversary?

Compass Points - 24/7/365 Deterrence?


The primary function of the US military is global deterrence. The best way to win wars is to deter them before they begin. Strong deterrence means less fighting. Weak deterrence results in more fighting.

Deterrence is made of two crucial ingredients: 1. demonstrated capabilities, and 2. demonstrated willingness.

It is not enough to have strong capabilities. A nation must demonstrate that it has the willingness to use those capabilities. Short of war, the best way to demonstrate capabilities is to use them in real world exercises or brief operations.

India is a priority partner for the US in Central and Eastern Europe

Kirk Shoemaker

Increasing friction between the United States and India in recent months risks fracturing a relationship that is too important to fail. As an emerging economic colossus, India is a critical trading partner for the US and an economic counterweight to China in Central and Eastern Europe.

To help India on its path to economic diversification and to ensure it serves as a counterbalance to China, the US and its European partners should incentivise mutually beneficial trade and investment between India and the Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs). As America’s biggest rival, China is making inroads with the CEECs. India provides a key economic counterweight that will bolster the strategic depth of the US and its allies.

Colombia sees 'real threat' of US military action, president tells BBC

Ione Wells

Colombia's President Gustavo Petro has told the BBC that he believes there is now a "real threat" of US military action against Colombia.

Petro said the US is treating other nations as part of a US "empire". It comes after Trump said a military operation in Colombia "sounds good". Petro said that the US risks transforming from "dominating the world" to becoming "isolated from the world."

He also accused US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents of acting like "Nazi brigades". Trump has significantly expanded ICE operations as part of what the administration says is a crackdown on crime and immigrants who illegally entered the US.

The Trump Doctrine

Srdja Trifkovic

“What a divine surprise!” exclaimed Charles Maurras, upon learning of Marshal Pétain’s rise to power in France in July 1940. The veteran leader of L’Action française expected the new regime to overturn the legacy of the republican, secular, masonic “anti-France” he hated with a passion.

In this hope, Maurras was disappointed: Pétain was outwitted by outright Nazi collaborationists. His turn of phrase nevertheless describes President Donald Trump’s December 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) for those who hope America can be once again a regular nation in its foreign affairs: powerful, secure, and focused on its pragmatic interests, in the realist tradition.

The president prefaced the 33-page document as “a roadmap to ensure America remains the greatest and most successful nation in human history and the home of freedom on earth.”

Total Defense for an Era of Total War

Alexander Noyes

When federal agents walked into the municipal utility building in Littleton, Massachusetts, in late 2023, they carried a warning that should have wounded Americans’ sense of security. Chinese state-backed operators had penetrated the town’s water system, quietly compromising its control network for years. Their goal was not espionage or theft but leverage—the ability to sow chaos in the United States and deter U.S. action abroad in the event of a future conflict.

Littleton was not an isolated event. In February 2024, U.S. federal agencies disclosed new details about Volt Typhoon, a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group first identified in 2023,

Bedroom to the battlefield: How the UK military is embracing gamers and coders

Peter Gillibrand

"All the lads here play Call of Duty Warzone, Battlefield... and I'm into Helldivers at the moment," says Charlie Bugby.

"Everyone plays games nowadays."

Like millions of young people up and down the UK, Charlie likes to unwind in front of a console or PC.

But unlike many others, the Army Lance Corporal puts his skills to use on the real-life battlefield, where he works with drones.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD), the government department in charge of the UK's military, has made no secret of the fact it wants more gamers to consider a career in the Armed Forces.

L/Cpl Bugby tells BBC Newsbeat it makes sense to him.

Greenland’s Rare Earths Aren’t All That

Christina Lu

To hear some U.S. officials tell it, Greenland is a treasure trove of crucial minerals ripe for the taking.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, for example, has hailed how “Greenland sits atop vast reserves of rare-earth elements,” while U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance has pointed to the territory’s “incredible natural resources.”

Venezuela: The Post-Maduro Oil, Gas and Mining Outlook

Luisa Palacios

The capture of Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces carries potentially dramatic consequences for Venezuela – including in its oil, gas and mining sectors. A partial recovery could come more quickly than some pessimists have contended. But this optimistic scenario depends on what kind of political leadership comes next.

Despite holding the world’s largest oil reserves, Venezuela’s oil industry has seen production decline over the decade-plus of the Maduro regime by almost 2 million barrels per day to its current level of about 1 million b/d. Oil is not the only natural resource in the country that has experienced this decline. Having the largest natural gas reserves in Latin America, Venezuela was wasting an amount equivalent to Colombia’s annual natural gas consumption by venting it into the atmosphere.

The New Imperial Age Trump, Venezuela, and a Century-Old Vision of American Power

Aroop Mukharji

When U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry lamented that Russian President Vladimir Putin was behaving “in a nineteenth-century fashion” after invading Crimea in 2014, Kerry probably did not anticipate how accurately his remark would describe U.S. foreign policy today. Analysts have drawn many historical parallels to the U.S. intervention in Venezuela last week—indeed, the twentieth century is replete with choices. But the period that resonates most today is the era when cyclical, heavy-handed U.S. interventions in Latin America began. That story starts in 1898.

After defeating Spain in the War of 1898 (also known as the Spanish-American War), the United States acquired former Spanish colonies in Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico and established a protectorate over Cuba. Separately, it annexed Hawaii and was exploring an isthmian canal through Nicaragua (later, Panama), as well as attempting to purchase territory from Denmark in the Caribbean. For half a century after 1898, the sun never set on the American empire.

The Aggressive Ambitions of Trump’s “Donroe Doctrine”

Robin Wright

The U.S. Institute of Peace, a monumental white building across from the Lincoln Memorial, in Washington, has an undulating glass roof in the shape of a dove, with wings that appear to be flying high above and beyond the exterior walls. The institute was founded by Congress during the Cold War to be an independent think tank dedicated to resolving international conflicts. Last spring, it was seized by the Trump Administration’s Department of Government Efficiency, with the help of the D.C. police, even though the building isn’t government-owned. The staff—including hundreds of leading specialists on global crises, who advised all branches of government—were fired. 

The takeover coincided with the startling decision to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development and downsize the State Department. Just a few days before Christmas, about thirty ambassadors were recalled from their posts over vague accusations of insufficient loyalty to President Trump’s “America First” priorities. Keith Mines, a career diplomat and former vice-president for Latin America at U.S.I.P., told me that “pulling out our whole diplomatic architecture” was a “stunning” change and would severely limit American capabilities durininstability abroad. (In full disclosure, I was a senior fellow at U.S.I.P. for fifteen years, but left to join another think tank months before it was taken over.)

Trump's grand plan to reshape the world order leaves Europe with a difficult choice to make

Allan Little

For 80 years, what bound the United States to Europe was a shared commitment to defence and a common set of values: a commitment to defend democracy, human rights and the rule of law.

That era was inaugurated in March 1947 in an 18-minute speech by President Harry Truman, in which he pledged US support to defend Europe against further expansion by the Soviet Union.

America led the creation of Nato, the World Bank, the IMF and the United Nations. And it bound itself into what became known as the "rules-based international order", in which nation states committed to a series of mutual obligations and shared burdens, designed to defend the democratic world against hostile authoritarian powers.

How the UK Is Undermining US Indo-Pacific Security

Alexander B. Gray, and Cleo Paskal

While the world’s attention is on Venezuela and the Western Hemisphere, the British government is careening this week toward a colossal strategic blunder with significant implications for American interests in the Indo-Pacific. The British parliament is in the process of passing the “Agreement concerning the Chagos Archipelago including Diego Garcia,” which would transfer sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago in the Indian Ocean from the UK to Mauritius. This archipelago contains Diego Garcia, one of the US military’s most critical facilities.

The Diego Garcia base, known colloquially as the “footprint of freedom,” is one of the few outside the United States that can reload nuclear submarines, port aircraft carriers, and base and launch strategic bombers, and is critical for Space Force operations.

Russian Propaganda Ramps Up After U.S. Raid in Venezuela

Julian E. Barnes

In the days since the U.S. raid in Venezuela, a network of Russian propaganda websites has been promoting a message that countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia should stop buying American military hardware, according to a firm that tracks the online activities.

The websites, known as “Portal Kombat,” have also said that the U.S. seizure of Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan president, shows that the United States is unreliable and dangerous.

An analysis by Alethea, a company that tracks influence operations, found that articles published by Sputnik, a media outlet controlled by the Russian state, were quickly amplified and promoted by the larger network of websites used by Russian security services to attack the West.

America’s New Imperialism

Michael Vatikiotis

Lost in the shock and awe of President Trump’s audacious snatching of Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro in the early hours of January 3 is the fact that America has a long history of orchestrating the departure of government leaders. Ngo Dinh Diem of South Vietnam in 1963, Salvador Allende of Chile in 1973, and then Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines in 1986, to name but three. One might also throw in Indonesia’s President Sukarno after a CIA-supported coup in 1965.

More recently, in concert with the EU, the US poured money and intelligence resources into popular protests that brought down the government of President Victor Yanukovych in February 2014.

How cyber warfare is becoming the first strike in modern conflicts

Rob Lenihan

It was the night the lights went out in Caracas.

The pre-dawn raid that saw U.S. special operations forces seize President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela and his wife, Cilia Flores, reportedly began with cyber-attacks that cut off power to large areas of the South American country’s capital city to allow planes and helicopters to strike key military sites.

President Donald Trump suggested that the U.S. used cyberattacks or other technical capabilities to cut power off in Caracas, according to Politico.

“It was dark, the lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have, it was dark, and it was deadly,” Trump said during a press conference at Mar-a-Lago detailing the operation.

Gen. Dan Caine, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that U.S. Cyber Command, U.S. Space Command, and combatant commands “began layering different effects” to “create a pathway” for U.S. forces flying into the country, but he did not elaborate on what those “effects” entailed.

Trump cuts to academia risk ceding AI lead, warns Microsoft scientist

Cristina Criddle and Rafe Rosner-Uddin

Microsoft’s chief scientist has warned that cuts to US federal funding for academic research will drive talent and ideas abroad, giving international rivals a lead in the artificial intelligence race. Eric Horvitz told the Financial Times that President Donald Trump’s decision to slash academic research funding could give other nations, such as China, an edge in science and technological innovation.

“I personally find it hard to see the logic of trying to compete with competitor nations at the same time as making these cuts,” Horvitz said. The intervention comes as US universities and federal agencies have been hit by billions of dollars in funding reductions since Trump took office last year. Those moves have been justified as cost-cutting measures or by ideological stances, such as blocking grants for diversity initiatives.