From Shahed to Geran: How Russia Continues to Reinvent the One-Way Attack Drone

Center for Strategic and International Studies | Kateryna Bondar and Nicole Errera

Russian Geran one-way attack drones operating in Ukraine have undergone rapid technological adaptations to overcome Ukrainian electronic warfare and air defense systems. Engineers at Russia's Alabuga and Izhevsk production facilities replaced basic Iranian Shahed-136 navigation components with advanced Controlled Reception Pattern Antennas, scaling from four-element Kometa-M4 units to 16-element Chinese modules by late 2025.

To preserve operational guidance amidst persistent signal jamming, Russian forces integrated dual-SIM ZTE cellular modems and Xingkai Tech mesh radio networks, enabling airborne signal repeating and real-time remote control over live optical video feeds. Payload capacity expanded significantly. Warhead weights grew from original 118-pound penetrators to 230-pound dual-warhead configurations, while airframes were adapted to deploy PTM-3 anti-tank mines, defensive anti-air missiles, and first-person view strike drones mid-flight. This ongoing subsystem evolution transformed preprogrammed long-range strike munitions into flexible, network-centric loitering combat aircraft capable of real-time reconnaissance and mid-mission redirection across Ukrainian airspace.

Comment

The rapid iteration of Geran airframes across the Alabuga and Izhevsk plants reflects a hybrid defence-industrial model that bypasses formal military procurement cycles. By integrating commercial off-the-shelf components—such as ZTE modems and Xingkai Tech XK-F358 mesh radios—Russian assembly lines trade long-term manufacturing standardisation for short-term operational adaptability. This reliance on rapid subsystem modification allows production plants to field countermeasures against Ukrainian jamming within months rather than years.

However, this design philosophy locks the Geran platform into a persistent dependence on foreign dual-use supply chains, particularly Chinese telecommunications hardware. Consequently, production output at Alabuga remains exposed to supply bottlenecks and component specification changes outside Russian state control.

Strategic Question for Discussion

Which factor poses a greater long-term risk to the Alabuga plant's high-rate drone manufacturing—the vulnerability of Chinese commercial supply chains to external trade controls, or the operational friction caused by constantly integrating unstandardised hardware revisions?

The available evidence points toward foreign supply chain fragility as the more critical vulnerability for Alabuga's manufacturing cadence. While Russian assembly lines have demonstrated agility in adopting varied hardware revisions, abrupt disruptions to Chinese microelectronic shipments would immediately bottleneck the production of CRPA guidance units and mesh modems essential for modern Geran operations.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here