McCrary Institute, U.S. Chamber of Commerce call for a streamlined approach to federal cyber regulations

Auburn University College of Engineering

The McCrary Institute for Cyber and Critical Infrastructure Security and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released a joint report on August 31, 2026, warning that fragmented federal cybersecurity regulations actively undermine national security by prioritizing compliance over defense. This regulatory overlap forces targeted companies to divert critical resources toward administrative reporting during active cyberattacks.

A recent Government Accountability Office report from July documented 117 federal cybersecurity regulations requiring incident reporting, with 48 targeting private industry across 27 different agencies. This represents a sharp increase from the 52 requirements across 22 agencies identified in a 2023 Department of Homeland Security report. To resolve this operational friction, the authors advocate establishing a single federal intake process led by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Efficiency remains paramount. Leveraging the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (CIRCIA) would allow organizations to report incidents once, harmonizing requirements across 33 federal departments.

Comment

The proliferation of overlapping cyber incident reporting mandates across 27 federal agencies exposes a fundamental command-and-control deficit in American defensive cyber operations. Without a unified reporting architecture, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency lacks the real-time situational awareness required to coordinate national-level responses to systemic threats. This structural fragmentation dilutes the operational efficacy of CISA during high-tempo crises.

Operationalising the "substantially similar" reporting clause within the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (CIRCIA) serves as the primary mechanism to consolidate these disparate reporting channels. By routing initial telemetry through a single CISA-managed portal, the Cyber Incident Reporting Council can establish a standardised data-sharing protocol across 33 federal departments. This centralised intake mechanism ensures that tactical threat data is instantly disseminated to sector-specific agencies like the Department of Energy without requiring redundant filings from targeted critical infrastructure operators.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency successfully operationalises the CIRCIA reporting framework, how will the Cyber Incident Reporting Council reconcile the conflicting statutory authorities of independent regulatory agencies that resist centralisation?

The trajectory indicates that independent regulators, particularly those overseeing financial and energy sectors, will likely leverage their distinct statutory mandates to maintain separate reporting pipelines. My assessment is that the Cyber Incident Reporting Council will be forced to accept a hybrid model where CISA acts as a primary clearinghouse, but individual agencies retain the final authority to demand supplementary, sector-specific disclosures. This compromise would preserve regulatory autonomy at the expense of the absolute operational streamlining envisioned by CIRCIA.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here