30 September 2026

U.S.-India Insight: India’s Trade Deals: Only a Starting Point to Progress

Csis | Richard M. Rossow

India has secured substantial nominal gains in bilateral goods trade following the implementation of economic agreements with Australia and the United Arab Emirates in 2022. Total annual goods trade between New Delhi and Canberra surged 76 percent to average $23 billion in fiscal years 2025 and 2026, while trade with Abu Dhabi climbed 81 percent to reach $100 billion annually over the same period.

Despite these impressive headline increases, neither partner has drastically altered India's aggregate trade basket, with Australia remaining stagnant at 2 percent and the United Arab Emirates shifting modestly from 7 to 8 percent. This marginal macro-level impact demonstrates that bilateral trade pacts fail to generate immediate structural shifts without concurrent domestic economic restructuring. Production Linked Incentive schemes and trade pacts must be underpinned by difficult structural reforms in land, labor, power, water, and judicial remediation to boost manufacturing competitiveness beyond its long-standing 13 to 15 percent share of gross domestic product.

Comment

Bilateral trade agreements signed by New Delhi often function primarily as diplomatic signalling mechanisms rather than comprehensive tariff-slashing measures. The structural inclusion lists and protracted phase-in periods embedded within the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with the United Arab Emirates constrain the immediate velocity of market integration. Domestic protectionist measures, such as the tariff barriers erected under the Make in India initiative, historically insulated domestic producers but simultaneously suppressed broader export competitiveness. Consequently, sustained industrial expansion remains tethered to domestic structural constraints rather than external trade pact signatures.

Strategic Question for Discussion
Which carries more weight in determining India's export growth following the CEPA implementation with the United Arab Emirates — aggregate tariff reductions or foundational domestic factor constraints like land and labor — and what would tip that balance?
The available data suggests that domestic factor constraints carry considerably more weight in limiting long-term competitiveness. Without fundamental reforms in land acquisition and labor regulations, external tariff concessions fail to generate sustained manufacturing growth.
Share your assessment in the comments below.