The Case for Economic Espionage

Foreign Affairs | David S. Cohen

Chinese state-sponsored espionage operations targeted United States commercial technologies in over half of 224 incidents recorded by the Center for Strategic and International Studies between 2000 and 2023. Former CIA Deputy Director David S. Cohen argues that Washington must conduct offensive economic espionage against foreign companies to protect American competitiveness.

Historical precedents include Cold War KGB trade secret theft and 1980s French intelligence surveillance of American technology firms. Foreign states routinely deploy intelligence services to bolster critical domestic industrial sectors. State-directed intellectual property theft systematically erodes Western technological dominance. Restraint leaves domestic firms vulnerable. Cohen advocates abandoning long-standing American policy prohibitions against intelligence gathering conducted for direct commercial advantage. Aligning intelligence collection with private sector innovation redefines national security statecraft in an era of intense geoeconomic rivalry. Washington faces structural pressure to leverage state intelligence assets for corporate defense and long-term market supremacy.

Comment

A shift in CIA operations toward economic intelligence targeting foreign enterprise creates severe friction within the Five Eyes alliance. Moving Directorate of Operations assets away from foreign military targets toward corporate R&D divisions dilutes traditional strategic intelligence collection. Operations directed at foreign commercial competitors expose covert networks to private cyber audit firms and foreign corporate counter-espionage.

Distributing proprietary data gathered under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act authorities to private domestic firms creates legal exposure under World Trade Organization rules. Granting preferential intelligence access to select commercial sectors risks compromising sensitive signals intelligence collection platforms managed by the National Security Agency. Consequently, operational authorities would require structural reform under Title 50 of the United States Code to manage classification boundaries and prevent selective corporate advantage.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If Washington authorises foreign commercial targeting under Title 50 of the United States Code, does the risk of compromising National Security Agency collection platforms outweigh the competitive advantage delivered to domestic industry?

The operational trade-off favours protecting primary signals intelligence platforms, as exposing sensitive collection capabilities for marginal corporate gains risks wider strategic intelligence failure. The pattern of previous economic espionage cases suggests that private sector dissemination creates unavoidable classification leaks, compromising NSA sources. Consequently, intelligence priorities are likely to remain focused on national defense targets rather than direct industrial support.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here