Russian Psychological Operations and Informational Warfare in the Middle East and North Africa

Irregular Warfare Initiative | Autumn Perkey

Russian state-backed media networks like RT Arabic and Sputnik Arabic are expanding psychological operations across the Middle East and North Africa by framing Western foreign policy as destabilizing. Following Moscow's 2015 military intervention in Syria, these outlets established deep distribution channels that now generate over 180 daily social media posts targeting regional audiences.

This structural access allows Russia to exploit existing local grievances without generating entirely novel narratives. In Iraq, a 2015 survey revealed that 44 percent of the population watched RT Arabic daily. Disinformation converts rapidly into physical actions. Operations like the Doppelganger campaign in Israel and rumors driving the October 29, 2024 riot at Makhachkala Airport demonstrate how digital manipulation triggers real-world mobilization. By presenting the United States as an unreliable partner, Russia seeks to erode Western influence, divert international focus from Ukraine, and consolidate its regional strategic foothold.

Comment

Russian state media deployment through RT Arabic functions as an asymmetric substitute for naval and ground force projection across the Levant. By capitalizing on regional distribution networks established during the 2015 intervention in Syria, Moscow converts low-cost digital output into political friction for Western partners. This reliance on cognitive domain manipulation allows the Kremlin to preserve influence across the Middle East while conserving kinetic resources for Eastern Europe.

The resulting systemic polarization forces host governments to redirect internal security assets toward counter-disinformation and civil unrest management. Consequently, host nations maintaining U.S. Central Command facilities—such as Al Udeid Air Base—face domestic political friction that directly constrains Western operational access during theater crises.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If low-cost operations via outlets like RT Arabic successfully constrain operational access around U.S. Central Command facilities, does kinetic force projection remain an effective counter-influence tool in the Middle East, or does it reinforce Moscow's escalation narrative?

The evidence suggests that relying primarily on kinetic deterrence fails to mitigate cognitive domain operations, as expanded military presence often provides fresh material for state-backed media campaigns. My assessment is that Western defense posture will face persistent operational friction unless anti-disinformation mechanisms are integrated directly into theater-level access agreements. This trajectory indicates that host-nation political vulnerabilities will continue to dictate the practical limits of regional power projection.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here