Pakistan Army: Disappearing The Living And Raising The Dead

Eurasia Review | Nilesh Kunwar

The Pakistan Army's media wing, the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR), faces intense scrutiny over contradictory public narratives regarding military clashes and counter-terrorism operations. During the February 27, 2019 aerial combat with India, ISPR's shifting claims about captured pilots indirectly confirmed that a Pakistani fighter jet was downed.

This communication pattern reflects a broader institutional tendency to manipulate information to manage domestic and international perceptions. Similar discrepancies emerged when ISPR denied the existence of Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Masood Azhar, contradicting earlier admissions by Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi. Recently, ISPR presented a man claiming to be Lashkar-e-Taiba operative Mohammad Asif, alias Hashim Musa, to refute Indian claims of his death. This move failed. The author suggests this defensive public relations effort was timed to influence the upcoming Financial Action Task Force (FATF) meeting, highlighting Rawalpindi's anxiety over international scrutiny of its counter-terrorism record and state-sponsored militancy.

Comment

The public relations strategy of the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) reveals a persistent reliance on rapid, unverified narrative-building during crises. This pattern was evident during the 2019 aerial skirmish when initial claims of multiple captured Indian pilots were hastily revised down to a single detainee, Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman. Such discrepancies expose a structural vulnerability within Rawalpindi's media apparatus where immediate domestic propaganda goals override long-term informational credibility.

This operational mechanism relies on presenting physical body-doubles or swift denials to counter external intelligence disclosures, as seen in the recent presentation of a purported civilian to refute the death of Special Services Group veteran Hashim Musa. By prioritizing immediate deniability ahead of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary review, Rawalpindi's media wing consistently sacrifices long-term institutional credibility for temporary relief from international sanctions.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If Rawalpindi's media wing continues to prioritize immediate domestic deniability over long-term credibility, how does this pattern of contradictory disclosures affect Pakistan's diplomatic leverage during upcoming Financial Action Task Force compliance evaluations?

The available evidence points toward a diminishing return on these information operations, as international bodies increasingly rely on independent intelligence and forensic verification rather than state-issued denials. Consequently, persistent discrepancies regarding high-profile militants like Hashim Musa are likely to compound Pakistan's credibility deficit, making it more difficult to secure favorable outcomes during Financial Action Task Force evaluations. This trajectory indicates that domestic narrative control is increasingly coming at the direct expense of international diplomatic and economic resilience.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here