Houthis’ Three-Pronged Attack A Threat To The World

Eurasia Review | Dr. Majid Rafizadeh

The Houthis threaten regional stability and global trade through ballistic missile and drone strikes against civilian and energy infrastructure in Saudi Arabia. King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh suffered attacks that killed at least 13 civilians and wounded more than 300 others, demonstrating a deliberate strategy against installations protected under the Geneva Conventions and UN Security Council Resolution 2216.

These cross-border operations run parallel to intensified offensives against government-held areas in Yemen, including the presidential complex in Aden, which exacerbate a humanitarian crisis comparable in scale to the conflict in Sudan. Furthermore, strikes targeting Aramco facilities introduce severe volatility into global energy markets and challenge freedom of navigation. Iranian support via the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps drives this military campaign, risking broader regional escalation unless the international community enforces stricter economic sanctions, tightens arms embargoes, and applies coordinated deterrence measures.

Comment

Ballistic missile strikes targeting King Khalid International Airport illustrate the expanding operational envelope of non-state actors exploiting asymmetric capabilities to pressure state infrastructure. When precision munitions and loitering munitions circumvent traditional air defence architectures, the cost asymmetry heavily favours the offensive actor.

Historically, the reliance on external state sponsors such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps mirrors proxy supply networks observed during the Iran-Iraq War, where sustained material transfers insulated local militias from indigenous industrial limits. Consequently, conventional deterrence doctrines struggle to establish credibility when adversaries absorb retaliatory costs through distributed networks.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If external state sponsorship continues to insulate non-state actors from the economic and military costs of striking critical energy infrastructure, how can traditional air defence architectures be adapted to maintain deterrence along civilian flight corridors?

The available evidence points toward a growing vulnerability in point-defence networks that cannot economically sustain perpetual interceptor expenditures against low-cost loitering munitions. This structural imbalance suggests that deterrence will increasingly depend on holding the external sponsor's rear-area logistics directly accountable rather than relying solely on terminal interception.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here