Cuba’s Point of No Return

Foreign Affairs | Will Freeman

Cuba is experiencing a profound systemic collapse as its governing regime survives despite the physical decay of its capital city. In February 2026, the historic Superior Institute of Industrial Design in central Havana completely collapsed, entombing several squatters after the state failed to address two partial collapses in 2025.

This structural failure reflects broader state abandonment. Over its 166-year history, the prominent building housed a Spanish officers’ club, U.S. occupation forces after 1898, and Cuba’s health ministry before becoming a design school. Declared uninhabitable years ago, the state never sent anyone to repair the structure. By June 2026, skinny men scaled the craggy surface of the sand-colored rubble, prying loose bits of brick to cart away. The regime remains intact. This stark juxtaposition highlights a country at a point of no return, where public infrastructure disintegrates while political control persists without providing basic public services.

Comment

The physical ruin of the Superior Institute of Industrial Design in Havana exposes a deliberate strategic trade-off by the Cuban state. Rather than allocating capital to Havana's municipal infrastructure, the Communist Party of Cuba prioritises its dwindling foreign currency reserves for internal security apparatuses and military-controlled tourism enterprises. This resource diversion is managed primarily through GAESA, the business conglomerate run by the Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces. Consequently, the Ministry of the Interior maintains coercive stability in Havana even as the surrounding urban landscape undergoes structural disintegration.

This asymmetric funding model carries severe downstream consequences for Cuba's long-term administrative capacity. By starving civilian ministries of basic maintenance funds, the state hollows out the technical expertise of municipal planning departments and civil defence units. Ultimately, this institutional decay leaves the Defensa Civil unable to manage large-scale urban emergencies, forcing a reliance on the Revolutionary Armed Forces to maintain public order during structural crises.

Strategic Question for Discussion

How does the progressive decay of Havana's municipal infrastructure alter the balance between GAESA's economic dominance and the Ministry of the Interior's capacity to maintain domestic security?

The trajectory indicates that municipal collapse will eventually outpace the Ministry of the Interior's coercive capacity as localized infrastructure failures trigger spontaneous, unmanageable public emergencies. While GAESA can shield its tourism assets from immediate decay, it cannot insulate the broader security apparatus from the systemic breakdown of water, power, and transport networks. Consequently, the regime's reliance on raw coercion is likely to face diminishing returns as the physical environment of Havana becomes increasingly uninhabitable.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here