25 November 2025

China’s Demographics Problem Grows

Philip Bowring

China’s leaders have known for some time that they have a demographics problem, with their concern growing at the threat to future prosperity and dynamism. The population decline is set to accelerate, with China’s male-female imbalance presenting limiting factors not faced by the rest of Asia.

The median age is already 40.2, nearly the same as older developed countries such as the UK (40.8) and higher than the United States at 38.5. China’s fertility rate appears to be about 1.1, or half the population replacement level.

Various programs in China, as in other countries such as South Korea with similar challenges, are focused on issues such as financial support for children, greater equality in the workplace, provision of nursery facilities, etc. Such incentives make sense but so far have had limited success in other countries. They may yet have an impact in China – though it is rather more difficult to force couples to have more children than it was to limit them to one child, as was the case with the One Child policy introduced in 1979 and only formally abandoned in 2015.

But compared with other countries facing the same birth collapse, China’s prospects for raising the fertility rate face a major additional obstacle, the imbalance between numbers of men and women of the childbearing age bracket. This is the indirect consequence of One Child – a deep-rooted patriarchal bias towards male children which led to widespread abortion of female foetuses. This is not just a product of the past. Although the imbalance of sexes at birth has narrowed, there is still a significant gap.

This year, according to UN World Population Prospects 2024, there are 44.4 million men in the 25-29 age group, which should be on the cusp of procreation, but only 38.4 million women. The gap in absolute terms diminishes with the subsequent cohorts but remains in double-digit percentages.

Congressional study urges countering the global spread of Chinese communist system


The Chinese Communist Party and its military forces are preparing the entire country for a future war with the United States over Taiwan, the hot spots in the South China Sea or disputed territory near Japan, according to a new report by a congressional China commission.

The 728-page annual report by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission also warns that the U.S. and allied effort to counter Chinese communist expansion and replacement of the U.S.-led democratic system is an urgent problem.

“Countering China’s aggression is now a truly global challenge,” the report said.

China’s large-scale military modernization advanced significantly and was not affected by extensive purges of key military leaders, the report said.

Over the past year, increases took place in nuclear warhead stockpiles, new amphibious warships, deployment of more advanced stealth fighter jets and greater fielding of drone weapons, the report said.

The military modernization has strengthened the People’s Liberation Army’s capabilities for launching an attack on Taiwan, the report states.

China has continued to rapidly advance its capabilities to launch a successful invasion of Taiwan,” said the report, noting intensified PLA operations near Taiwan and deployment of new forces for an amphibious attack.

The Enduring Dangers of Anti-Satellite Weapons and Space Debris

Kathleen Curlee , and Lauren Kahn

On November 4, 2025, a piece of space debris collided with China’s Shenzhou-20 spacecraft. This forced China to delay the return of its three astronauts while engineers and authorities assess the damage to the craft. Although the exact nature of the strike and the extent of the damage are unknown, it is possible that the offending piece of space junk was no bigger than a few millimeters. But at orbital speeds, debris can collide with objects in space nearly ten times faster than the speed of a bullet.

What is more concerning is that there are tens of thousands of pieces of debris larger than 10 centimeters, each capable of crippling satellites or endangering crews, and there is currently no reliable way to remove them. More concerning still, many of these hazards were not the result of accidents. They were generated through deliberate anti-satellite (ASAT) tests.

On January 11, 2007, China used an ASAT weapon to destroy its aging Fengyun (FY-1C) polar-orbit weather satellite, creating a cloud of debris that persists to this day. ASAT weapons involve the deliberate destruction of satellites in orbit, often using kinetic interceptors launched from Earth. The strike was hardly unprecedented: both the United States and the Soviet Union tested ASAT systems during the Cold War. However, those strikes rarely created significant debris because they were conducted at lower altitudes.

China Built the Solar Century; The Fusion Century Can Still Be Ours

Jackie Siebens

It’s producing nearly a terawatt of new clean energy capacity every year — the equivalent of more than 300 large power plants worth of generation, according to The Economist. That pace has made it a new kind of energy superpower: one that manufactures, builds, and exports clean electricity on a planetary scale. And because that scale has driven prices so low, the rest of the world is now buying from Beijing. Even if the current US government is less supportive of renewables or decarbonization, global demand is undeniable: emerging markets are hungry for cheap renewables, with countries from Pakistan to Brazil rapidly importing Chinese solar and wind equipment to meet rising electricity needs.

There’s no catching up to that. We’re not going to out-subsidize, out-manufacture, or out-coordinate China on solar panels, inverters, or transmission wire. The truth is we didn’t really try to compete until we had already lost—the United States innovated and invented but failed to build the environment needed to rapidly manufacture and scale its own technologies, ceding the market to China.

Explaining The Lack of Proficiency in Arab Armies with Solutions to Modernize

Julian McBride

Arab armies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA region) currently do not perform as proficiently as Western militaries in North America, Europe, or even East Asian militaries. Because of stagnation, corruption, and a lack of a constitution, Arab militaries are plagued by human rights abuses and a lack of unit cohesion.

Numerous wars and conflicts in the region have seen Arab armies suffer unnecessary casualties, minimal unit cohesion, and failed reconstructions of their wartime doctrines. Whereas other regional militaries, such as Israel and Turkey, excel, the rest struggle to adapt with proficiency and modernization.

Despite numerous challenges, militaries in the Arab world remain in a state of perpetual limbo. Some are currently adopting new doctrines and tactics to revitalize their armed forces and restore the readiness level the region lacks. Reviewing several key points, we can examine why MENA armies were constituted to avoid becoming competent and proficient.
Lack of Cohesion in Different Sects

In the ancient and medieval eras, the Arab world was united under the umbrella of various empires, forming caliphates and sultanates. Under the allegiance of ruling authorities, Arabs under united armies conquered the Romans, Crusaders, and even the Mongol Ilkhanate, as the latter three suffered major problems of infighting and usurpations.

Saudi Arabia wants to buy nearly 300 U.S. tanks, White House says

Colin Demarest

An Abrams tank with the 1st Cavalry Division at the National Training Center in November. Photo: Tyler Williams/DVIDS

Saudi Arabia committed to buying hundreds of U.S.-made tanks, part of a larger spending-and-security conversation between the two countries, the White House said.

Why it matters: It's a massive, long-term commitment — and one that appears to shrug off doubts regarding the tank's role on the battlefield of the future.

Driving the news: The Trump administration on Tuesday announced a slew of deals with Riyadh following consultations with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.The arrangement for "nearly" 300 tanks, in particular, will enable "Saudi Arabia to build up its own defense capabilities" while "safeguarding hundreds of American jobs," it said.

Zoom in: General Dynamics Land Systems makes the Abrams main battle tank. It's used by the U.S. Army and has been adopted overseas, including by Ukraine.A company spokesperson referred questions about the plan to the State Department.

Zoom out: MBS earlier in the day told President Trump that Saudi Arabia would raise its stateside investments to $1 trillion, up from $600 billion.

Terrifying internet vulnerability EXPOSED Cloudflare crash

HARRIET ALEXANDER, US SENIOR FEATURES WRITER

To millions around the world who – perhaps, unwittingly – depend on Cloudflare's services, the blackout was unnerving.

The Silicon Valley firm that is the foundation of a fifth of all websites worldwide, was brought to its knees on Tuesday morning. The issue was first detected at 6:48am Eastern Time.
Internet users experienced the outage as maddening connectivity issues. Elon Musk's X, Sam Altman's ChatGPT, Spotify and Shopify were among the sites grinding to a halt. More essential organizations, such as the New Jersey transit system, New York City's emergency management offices and the French national railway company SNCF were also reportedly impacted.

By 9:42am the Cloudflare said a 'fix' had been 'implemented' and by 12:44pm the service was fully restored. Dane Knecht, Cloudflare's chief technology officer - whose X bio boasts: 'I help invent the future' - was grovelling in his apology.

'I won't mince words: earlier today we failed our customers and the broader Internet,' he said, adding that it 'caused real pain' and the 'issue, impact it caused, and time to resolution is unacceptable.' For a company that promises to 'build a better internet,' the drama was mortifying. To millions around the world who – perhaps, unwittingly – depend on Cloudflare's services, the blackout was unnerving


Trump Said to Authorize C.I.A. Plans for Covert Action in Venezuela

Tyler PagerJulian E. Barnes and Eric Schmitt

With the largest U.S. aircraft carrier now positioned in the Caribbean, President Trump has approved additional measures to pressure Venezuela and prepare for the possibility of a broader military campaign, according to multiple people briefed on the matter.

Mr. Trump has signed off on C.I.A. plans for covert measures inside Venezuela, operations that could be meant to prepare a battlefield for further action, these people said. At the same time, they said, he has authorized a new round of back-channel negotiations that at one point resulted in President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela offering to step down after a delay of a couple of years, a proposal the White House rejected.

It is not clear what the covert actions might be or when any of them might be carried out. Mr. Trump has not yet authorized combat forces on the ground in Venezuela, so the next phase of the administration’s escalating pressure campaign on the Maduro government could be sabotage or some sort of cyber, psychological or information operations.

The president has not made a decision about the broader course of action to pursue in Venezuela, nor publicly articulated his ultimate goal beyond stemming the flow of drugs from the region. And military and C.I.A. planners have prepared multiple options for different contingencies.

Military planners have prepared lists of potential drug facilities that could be struck. The Pentagon is also planning for strikes on military units close to Mr. Maduro. Mr. Trump held two meetings in the White House Situation Room last week to discuss Venezuela and review options with his senior advisers.

The surreal 45-day trek at the heart of Nato’s defence

Laura Pitel 
Source Link

US general Ben Hodges was overseeing a military exercise in Europe when an unexpected incident occurred at a Polish railway station.

As dozens of Bradley infantry fighting vehicles thundered through, some of them had their gun turrets ripped off by the platform roof. “Nobody got hurt,” said Hodges, who was at the time the commander of US forces in Europe and has since retired. “But that was thousands of dollars of damage. And 10 vehicles that weren’t going to be ready to fight for some time.”

A decade later, crumbling bridges, mismatched rail gauges and labyrinthine bureaucracy remain significant hurdles to moving military assets across Europe. In the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, France was unable to send tanks to Romania on the shortest land route through Germany and instead had to ship them via the Mediterranean.

These examples serve as a stark reminder that Europe’s race to re-arm is not limited to procuring weapons or building up big armies. It must also be possible to swiftly transport troops, equipment and ammunition from the west — where the bulk of Nato’s forces are based — to the alliance’s eastern flank.

Nato vessel HNLMS Tromp at Rotterdam — a key port for military equipment arriving by sea from the UK © Frank de Roo/ANP/AFP/Getty Images

Currently it would take roughly 45 days to move an army from the strategic ports in the west to countries bordering Russia or Ukraine, EU officials estimated as they prepared to publish a new proposal on “military mobility” on Wednesday. The aim, they said, was to bring that down to five or even three days.

The Case for Radio Free Asia and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty: Ensuring Information Access for Closed Societies

Olivia Enos 

In March 2025, the Trump administration issued an executive order aimed at closing the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM).1 This decision affected Radio Free Asia (RFA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), both of which are USAGM grantees, and may ultimately lead to their closure. Such a development would be a strategic loss for the United States and the world.

Despite their names, RFA and RFE/RL are so much more than radio. They do provide radio broadcasts to countries with strict information control. But they also offer critical on-the-ground reporting that informs the American public and provides a voice to those persecuted by authoritarian governments in Europe, Central Asia, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific. Both serve strategic functions that advance US interests by conveying the truth about the value of freedom and human rights. The information they provide produces goodwill toward the United States in authoritarian countries that seek to sow discord with America and to deceive their populations about the importance of freedom.

Since the executive order went into effect, RFA has been forced to suspend news operations for the first time in its 29 years of existence and laid off nearly all of its staff in hopes of fully reopening once funding is restored.2 The closure of critical services, including the Mandarin, Uyghur, Tibetan, Cantonese, Korean, and Burmese services, has left citizens of authoritarian countries without an information lifeline. Policymakers and civil society actors who once relied on RFA’s groundbreaking reporting, especially through its English-language media, are now without a critical source of information to inform foreign policy decisions.

Ukraine hits targets in Russia with U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles, military says


KYIV, Ukraine — Ukraine’s military said Tuesday it had attacked military targets in Russia with U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles, calling it a “significant development.”

Ukraine has not previously stated openly that it uses the advanced U.S.-provided ballistic missile systems on targets inside Russia, although the restriction on doing so was lifted by the outgoing Biden administration a year ago.

“The use of long-range strike capabilities, including systems such as ATACMS, will continue,” the military general staff said in a statement on Tuesday.

Kyiv received the systems in 2023 but was initially restricted to using them only on its own territories, nearly a fifth of which are occupied by Russia.

Joe Biden, who was U.S president at the time, lifted those restrictions in November 2024, a move which was initially criticized by his successor Donald Trump.

Ukraine has requested U.S.-made Tomahawk missiles that have a range of 1,550 miles, saying they will help bring Russia to the negotiating table.

Although Trump initially pondered the idea of selling them to Kyiv, in November he said he was “not really” considering the move.

A Chinese firm bought an insurer for CIA agents - part of Beijing's trillion dollar spending spree

Celia Hatton

Since 2018, the United States has been tightening its laws to prevent its rivals from buying into its sensitive sectors – blocking investments in everything from semiconductors to telecommunications.

But the rules weren't always so strict.
In 2016, Jeff Stein, a veteran journalist covering the US intelligence community, got a tip-off: a small insurance company that specialised in selling liability insurance to FBI and CIA agents had been sold to a Chinese entity.

"Someone with direct knowledge called me up and said, 'Do you know that the insurance company that insures intelligence personnel is owned by the Chinese?'" he remembers. "I was astonished!"

In 2015, the insurer, Wright USA, had been quietly purchased by Fosun Group, a private company believed to have very close connections with China's leadership.

US concerns became immediately clear: Wright USA was privy to the personal details of many of America's top secret service agents and intelligence officials. No one in the US knew who might have access to that information now the insurer and its parent, Ironshore, were Chinese-owned.

Wright USA wasn't an isolated case.
The BBC has exclusive early access to brand new data that shows how Chinese state money has been flowing into wealthy countries, buying up assets in the US, Europe, the Middle East and Australia.

Sri Lanka’s Interest-Rate Trap

ARJUN JAYADEV, AHILAN KADIRGAMAR, and J.W. MASON

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka has inexplicably maintained high interest rates in a deflationary environment, which increases debt-service costs and suppresses economic activity. It must change course now, because austerity in the name of fiscal sustainability is self-defeating if it destroys the conditions for growth.

BANGALORE – Sri Lanka is experiencing its worst economic crisis since gaining independence in 1948. After defaulting on its external debt in 2022, the government was forced to impose severe austerity measures in exchange for a loan from the International Monetary Fund. As a result, the poverty rate remains alarmingly high, reaching 24.5% in 2024, up from 11.3% in 2019, while real per capita GDP is not expected to return to its 2018 level until 2026. The country is losing a generation to malnutrition, high youth unemployment, and educational losses as school-dropout rates climb.

Why the US Economy Has Remained Stronger Than Expected

PINELOPI KOUJIANOU GOLDBERG

Although most economists have issued dire warnings about the damage tariffs and other ill-advised policies would cause, the US economy’s aggregate indicators have remained quite robust. Some of the costs may simply have been postponed, but rapid advances in AI could well offset them when they fall due.

NEW HAVEN – Despite dire predictions, major indicators for the US economy still seem robust. Although the recent government shutdown has delayed the release of third-quarter data, growth in the second quarter of 2025, at an annualized rate of 3.8%, was higher than expected, inflation seems under control – higher tariffs notwithstanding – and the stock market has been soaring.

Is Russia’s Hybrid War on Europe Becoming Conventional?

SŁAWOMIR SIERAKOWSKI

From arson attacks on civilian targets to the recent bombing of a rail line between Warsaw and Ukraine, Russian provocations inside Poland are intensifying. By stoking anti-Ukrainian and anti-EU sentiment, the Kremlin hopes to empower the "useful idiots" of the Polish populist right.

WARSAW – On November 14, two operatives tried to sabotage the railway line running from Warsaw into Ukraine. An explosion destroyed a section of track near the village of Mika, while another incident damaged power lines near Gołąb station, forcing a train carrying 475 passengers to make an emergency stop. Had it not been for the driver’s quick reaction, there would have been fatalities.

Why Hasn’t the EU Given up on Turkey?

Robert Ellis

There are no limits to the extent some people are prepared to go to hold on to power. This is more apparent in an autocratic system than in a democratic one. Russian president Vladimir Putin’s hold on power is determined by the outcome of his war on Ukraine, and his new nuclear-powered Burevestnik cruise missile and Poseidon drone are indicators.

In Turkey, the aging autocrat, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has his back to the wall, and now he has announced “a new juncture” in the Kurdish peace process. To hardened observers of the Turkish scene, this is old wine in a new bottle.

Turkey’s Kurds first became a problem with the Sheikh Said rebellion in 1925. Said was the head of an influential religious order, and Mustafa Kemal’s secular reforms (the abolition of the Caliphate and the abrogation of Sharia law) reduced their power.

The Treaty of Sèvres in 1920 partitioned Turkey and the creation of an autonomous Kurdistan. Still, after the War of Independence, this was superseded by the Lausanne treaty in 1923, which defined the borders of modern Turkey. Said called for an independent Kurdistan and the restoration of the Caliphate, but this incipient Kurdish nationalism consolidated Kemalist reforms and Turkish nationalism.

Turkey’s SHORAD System Is Designed to Knock Drone Swarms Out of the Sky

Brandon J. Weichert

The Turkish state arms manufacturer, Mechanical and Chemical Industry Corporation (MKE), conducted live-fire trials of the Tolga SHORAD system at the Karapinar Firing, Test, and Evaluation Center. Around 100 observers from the Turkish Armed Forces and other security agencies were present. Over eight different engagement scenarios, the system achieved a 100 percent success rate in defeating drones—both via “soft kill” (electronic warfare/jamming methods) and “hard-kill” (with guns and/or cannons).

This represents a major development for Turkey, which is already advancing at breakneck speeds toward becoming a major arms distributor on the global market. An arms distributor that specializes in next-generation warfare platforms, such as drones (and now, in areas like counter-drones).

Why Is Turkey Pouring Money into Its Military?

Not only is Turkey becoming a major global arms exporter, but its military is increasingly advanced. What Ankara has done in terms of making Turkey an indispensable drone producer—notably in Ukraine—is to ensure that its leaders’ neo-Otttoman vision stands a chance at being realized.

Why Hezbollah’s Disarmament Is Stalling

Rany Ballout

Now that the US-brokered ceasefire in Gaza appears to be holding, does it signify that an Israeli war against Hezbollah is imminent? Recent developments along the Israel-Lebanon border increasingly suggest that a major confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah is possible. Israel has been carrying out airstrikes, including assassinations and strikes against Hezbollah sites, largely in southern Lebanon, since the November ceasefire that ended the war between the two in 2024. Jerusalem is now intensifying its escalation as a possible preparation for a major offensive against Hezbollah. Many analyses point out that should the Lebanese authorities fail to disarm the militia, Israel will begin a confrontation.

The escalation against Hezbollah comes amid the group’s ongoing efforts to block its disarmament and disrupt any diplomatic initiative toward broader Israeli-Lebanese peace talks. President Trump, in his speech before the Knesset, celebrated the US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and praised Lebanese president Joseph Aoun for his stance on disarmament. Aoun soon called for negotiations with Israel, signaling a potential breakthrough. He even expressed openness to direct talks, a historic shift in Lebanon’s posture.

A week later, US special envoy Tom Barrack echoed this call, urging Lebanon to engage in peace talks to address border and security issues while warning that Hezbollah’s refusal to disarm risks triggering a major Israeli offensive. Barrack reiterated his message lately, while calling Lebanon a “failed state” amid the stalemate that is preventing Hezbollah’s disarmament.

"Win Our Wars"

Francis P. Sempa

A front-page story in the Washington Times by Ben Wolfgang is headlined “Top Officers Lose Trust in Hegseth.” The story quotes “numerous high-ranking officers,” anonymous retired and current generals and flag officers, and top civilians at the Pentagon who contend that War Secretary Hegseth is an “unserious” and “grandstanding” leader with a “junior officer’s” mentality who is doing “deep damage to the military.” Hegseth, they say, is seen as “unprofessional,” and his personnel moves are leading to “an unprecedented and dangerous exodus of talent from the Pentagon.”

Hegseth is weakening the military by fighting the “culture war” within the ranks, according to liberal defense commentator Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Institution. O’Hanlon, it appears, speaks for the pro-DEI and pro-woke high-level officers who implemented the Obama-Biden transformation of the armed forces from the warrior ethos of the past into a kinder, gentler force where promotions were based not on merit but on diversity.

It is a military that has not won a war since 1991 in the Persian Gulf, and that was spread thin fighting endless wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and waging the Global War on Terror. It is a military where physical standards were sometimes lowered in the name of diversity, and where rules of engagement sometimes gave advantages to our enemies and unnecessarily exposed our forces to greater danger. None of this was the fighting force’s fault—it was, instead, the fault of civilian and military leaders who forgot or simply ignored that the primary mission of our armed forces is, in Gen. Douglas MacArthur’s words, “to win our wars.”

American Technology Was Born for This Moment

Larsen Jensen

I have stood on two podiums that changed my life: the Olympic medal stand and a Navy SEAL team room. The lesson was the same. Standards win. When you uphold the standard, you earn the right to expect victory. That is true in the pool, on the battlefield, and in the lab.

Today, America faces a test that will be decided not by speeches but by outcomes. We must deter wars abroad while crushing threats at home from narco-terrorists and cyber gangs to regimes racing to dominate AI, energy, and manufacturing. The good news is that American technology was born for this moment. And the new capital of that resurgence is not the Silicon Valley of yesterday. We are seeing the rise of new innovation hubs where engineers, operators, and entrepreneurs are quietly building the tools that will define the next American century.

During my deployments, I saw how the right technology in the right hands could transform missions. But too often our system delivered the opposite: yesterday’s technology tomorrow. Procurement was designed to favor incumbents instead of results. That has to change. Warfighters deserve equipment that works now, not promises for later.

The Marine Corps Could Not Fight Fallujah Today

Gary Anderson

My colleague Roger Kaplan recently wrote an excellent review of the PBS documentary, The Last 600 Meters, which is an excellent description of the battles of Najaf and Fallujah during the Iraq war. The primary assault troops in both battles were U.S. Marines, and the primary figures in the narrative are Marines whose tales are told in their own words. The program is gripping and vivid. It is “must-see” viewing for anyone interested in what really happened in the war.

Marine Corps tactics in those battles were not an accident. The Corps had been carefully refining its approach to urban warfare since the events in Mogadishu, Somalia, in 1993. Through wargame simulations and physical experimentation culminating in the 1998 Urban Warfare experiments in cities such as Charleston, SC, Jacksonville, FL, and Oakland, CA, the Marine Corps developed new tactics and technologies designed to limit both U.S. and civilian casualties while inflicting unacceptable losses on the enemy. (RELATED: Real Leadership in the Unsung Men of the Armed Forces)

These efforts resulted in a philosophy called the “Three Block War,” where Marines were taught to be prepared to fight high-intensity battles in one part of a city, do police-like peacekeeping in another, and humanitarian operations in yet a third. This was particularly important in Najaf, where the Grand Mosque, sacred to Shiite Muslims, was s key objective for both sides. It was critically important to U.S. planners that the U.S. forces not further anger the Shiite majority of the country.

Future War Will Be Fought with Sticks and Stones

Casey Christie

In an era defined by artificial intelligence, drones, and satellite-guided warfare, it may seem absurd to suggest that the future of war lies in trenches, artillery, and rifles. Yet history has a way of circling back on itself and as nations race to develop increasingly advanced systems of destruction, they also create the means of their own paralysis. The next great war will not be won by the most technologically advanced army, but by the one that can still fight when all technology fails. This is not a romantic return to the past, nor a doomsday prediction, but a logical outcome of warfare’s evolution. Each new military breakthrough has produced a corresponding countermeasure, driving modern battle toward a point of diminishing returns. Directed-energy weapons now drop entire drone swarms from the sky. Cyber-attacks can paralyze command networks. Electromagnetic pulse (EMP) systems threaten to fry electronics across vast regions. Logically, therefore, when all sides possess such capabilities, the advantage shifts not to the most advanced, but to the most adaptable.

For over a century, the trajectory of war has been defined by progress – faster aircraft, smarter bombs, and more connected command networks. Yet every step toward technological supremacy also increases fragility. Modern militaries are built upon vulnerable foundations: GPS, communications satellites, and data-dependent logistics. An adversary that can disrupt those systems does not need to outgun its opponent; it only needs to unplug it. The U.S., the U.K., China, and Russia are all developing EMP and high-power microwave weapons designed to do exactly that. The U.S. Department of Defense has warned repeatedly that an EMP detonation could disable unshielded electronics across an entire theatre of operations. Russia claims to have a number of non-nuclear EMP devices that have allegedly been tested for battlefield use. China’s military doctrine openly discusses “information dominance” as a means of blinding an adversary before the first shot is fired. If such weapons are ever used at scale, the result would be immediate regression as drones would fall, satellites would go silent, and precision-guided munitions would become scrap metal. Armies would be forced to fight with what still works: small arms, fieldcraft, artillery, and ground tactics that predate the digital age.

The Case for Taxing AI

KEVIN O’NEIL

If AI causes mass unemployment or severe fiscal shocks, elected officials and policymakers will need to act fast to limit the disruption. Fortunately, some of the most reliable and powerful options are also the most familiar.

WASHINGTON, DC – Hardly a day goes by without new headlines about how AI is poised to transform the economy. Even if claims that “AI is the new electricity” prove to be exaggerated, we should still prepare for deep change. One of the most powerful and reliable mechanisms for ensuring that AI benefits society is also one of the most familiar: taxation.

Can AI Be Asia’s Next Growth Engine?

LEE JONG-WHA

Asia’s growth model is under intense strain, and rapid population aging will only make matters worse. But, by fostering the skills people need to make use of AI and building institutions that enable them to apply those skills creatively, Asia's economies can unlock new sources of inclusive, durable growth.

SEOUL – Two decades after globalization fueled a global economic boom, growth has shifted onto a more subdued path, where it is likely to remain for the foreseeable future. Beyond the immediate shock of fragmenting trade and investment ties – a result of rising geopolitical tensions, particularly between the United States and China – lie structural headwinds, including population aging, stagnant productivity, and the growing costs of inequality and natural disaster. These challenges strike at the heart of Asia’s growth model.

Let a Thousand AI Regimes Bloom

ANGELA HUYUE ZHANG

While critics of decentralized technology regulation warn of higher compliance costs for businesses, Chinese-style centralization is hardly preferable. In fact, not only do regulatory patchworks tend to converge, but they also provide the flexibility that rapid technological change demands.

LOS ANGELES – It is widely assumed that America is “deregulating” AI, and it’s not hard to see why. The Trump administration has rescinded President Joe Biden’s AI executive orders and unveiled an “AI Action Plan” promising to “dismantle unnecessary regulatory barriers.” When Vice President JD Vance attended the Paris AI Action Summit back in February, he warned Europeans that “excessive regulation” would cripple their AI industry.