The claim that wars can only be won by conquering and occupying ground is a misleading cliché in American defense commentary, often attacking the false "airpower alone" proposition. Modern military campaigns succeed by integrating capabilities across domains to achieve defined political objectives, which do not always require occupation or territorial conquest.
Defining victory narrowly as occupation rigs the argument for land power, ignoring campaigns like Operation Desert Storm, where airpower dismantled Iraq's military before ground forces secured Kuwait. Similarly, Operation Allied Force coerced Slobodan Milošević into capitulation without a U.S. ground invasion, demonstrating that stand-off strikes can impose outcomes when the objective is coercion, not occupation. Strategic success demands matching means to ends, whether that involves land forces for occupation or aerospace power for coercion, denial, or degradation, as seen in Israel's Operation Rising Lion against Iran's nuclear program.
No comments:
Post a Comment