Artificial intelligence has become a primary axis of geopolitical competition, with Asian economies and the European Union adopting fundamentally divergent strategies for its integration. Asian states frame AI as a coordination problem requiring state intervention to accelerate demand, while Europe views it primarily as a liability problem necessitating state management.
This difference yields varied adoption rates, with generative AI reaching 53 percent global population adoption within three years. China employs mandate-led diffusion, targeting 90 percent penetration by 2030. South Korea triples its AI budget to 10.1 trillion won ($6.94 billion) for a statute-plus-capital model. India's subsidy-as-infrastructure offers compute at 65 rupees ($0.72) per hour. Japan pursues capital-intensive catch-up with over $99 billion committed, and Singapore achieves 61 percent population adoption via governance by measurement. The EU's liability-focused AI Act contributes to a significant adoption gap between large (55%) and small (17%) enterprises, with SME compliance costs estimated at €200,000-€500,000, and only $20.9 billion in private AI investment in 2025, risking €1.5 trillion in unrealized digital value.
No comments:
Post a Comment