Publication › Houthi Attacks in the Red Sea and the Shifting Paradigms of Modern Warfare

Houthi Attacks in the Red Sea and the Shifting Paradigms of Modern Warfare

Maj Gen PK Mallick, VSM (Retd)

Strategic Study India | · 28 July 2026

Contents

1. Introduction
2. Importance of Bab el-Mandeb Strait
3. The Shift in Maritime Traffic and Island Governance
4. Houthi Background and Evolution of its Capabilities
5. The Mechanism of Strategic Leverage
6. Internal Fragility and the Gaza Incentive
7. Operational Chronology and the Mechanics of the Maritime Campaign
8. Implications of the Houthi Attacks on Global Maritime Trade
9. The Escalation Ladder and the U.S. Response
10. U.S.–U.K. Military Response
11. Tactical Degradation vs Operational Resilience
12. Immediate Houthi Retaliation and Counter-Strikes
13. Structural Dilemmas and Strategic Options for Western Policy
14. Decoding the Tower 22 Attack in Jordan
15. Lessons Learned in the Red Sea
16. Role of Iranian Intelligence-Gathering Vessels and AIS Manipulation
17. Houthi–Iran Outsourced Kill-Chain vs Conventional Naval ISR-Strike Chain
18. Strategic Implications for Modern Naval Warfare
19. Information Operations: Legitimacy Through Resistance Narratives
20. Deterrence Failure and the Escalation Imperative
21. Conclusion
22. Subsequent Developments: Operation Rough Rider and the 2026 Iran Crisis
23. The Linkage Between Houthi Red Sea Operations and Iran's Actions in the Strait of Hormuz
24. Post Script
25. Endnotes

Introduction

The character of warfare is changing rapidly. The engines for this rapid change are emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Drones), Cyber, the Internet of Things (IoT), Big Data, 5G technology, Quantum Computing, Synthetic Biology, 3D printing, etc. The drivers of these emerging technologies have been designed for consumer products. The commodified versions of the technology are now being used to create new, highly effective and cheap weapons systems, with far-reaching consequences for today's warfare.

Innovations like ubiquitous sensing, meshing of civilian and military sensors, decentralised command and control, the abundant use of drones of all sizes and types across all domains, increased automation of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and battlespace management, information operations and battles of narratives have emerged.

Technology is a great leveller. Terrorists and Insurgents, Violent Non-State Actors, smaller organisations and countries pick up these technologies very fast. They are tech-savvy, networked organisations, nimble on their feet, taking asymmetric advantage of their way of warfare.

Can IMEC Survive the Iran War?

National Interest | Harsh V. Pant, and Dharminder Singh Kaleka

The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) faces severe operational paralysis as the 2026 Iran war and Houthi maritime strikes disrupt critical trade chokepoints. This vulnerability forces a shift toward a hard-security architecture to safeguard the multimodal route. Consequently, participating nations are transitioning from purely commercial planning to active naval cooperation.

The initiative was originally designed to bypass vulnerable maritime arteries like the Suez Canal and the Strait of Hormuz. However, the northern rail segment through Jordan to the Israeli port of Haifa remains blocked due to stalled Arab-Israeli normalization and Saudi Arabia's insistence on a Palestinian state. To counter these political and physical bottlenecks, a defensive maritime arc linking India, Israel, and Greece is emerging to protect critical infrastructure, undersea cables, and energy pipelines. While bilateral trade between India and the United Arab Emirates exceeded $101 billion in fiscal year 2025–26, the corridor's long-term viability depends on establishing robust security frameworks and digital interoperability to withstand ongoing geopolitical shocks.

Comment

India's maritime strategy is expanding beyond the Indian Ocean into the Mediterranean. Access to the Souda Bay naval facility in Greece provides the Indian Navy with a vital logistical node. This footprint complements New Delhi's commercial presence at the Israeli port of Haifa, securing the projected IMEC sea lanes. Anchoring this trilateral arc allows India to project hard power directly into European waters to protect its digital and energy assets.

To read in details click here

Rubio Vows Iran, Russia Crises Won’t Weaken US Commitment To Asia

Eurasia Review  |  Alex Raufoglu

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reassured Southeast Asian partners that escalating conflicts with Iran and Russia would not diminish Washington’s security commitments in the Indo-Pacific. However, the intensifying standoff in the Strait of Hormuz threatens to disrupt vital energy supplies, directly undermining the economic stability of ASEAN member states.

This divergence highlights a structural gap between America's traditional focus on military deterrence and the region's immediate domestic anxieties regarding inflation, fuel subsidies, and trade route reliability. During the ministerial summit in Manila, private discussions dominated by the Middle East crisis revealed that regional governments prioritize national economic survival over geopolitical alignment. While the United States maintains its formidable military presence to deter Chinese expansionism in the South China Sea, its long-term influence remains vulnerable if it cannot address these pressing economic challenges. Ultimately, prolonged instability in the Gulf risks rendering Washington militarily indispensable yet increasingly irrelevant to the daily economic realities of Southeast Asian households.

Comment

The vulnerability of ASEAN economies to maritime disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz exposes a fundamental mismatch between American security guarantees and Southeast Asian economic survival. While Washington deploys assets like the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower to secure Middle Eastern shipping lanes, these tactical deployments cannot offset the soaring insurance premiums and freight rates that directly fuel domestic inflation in Manila or Jakarta. Consequently, the strategic utility of the US Seventh Fleet's defence umbrella diminishes when regional states are forced to independently absorb the macroeconomic shocks of prolonged Middle Eastern instability.

To read in details click here

The People's Liberation Army's Military Training System

The PLA Brief

The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has restructured its military training framework into a progressive three-tier system to generate the combat capabilities required for Integrated Joint Operations. This systematic overhaul transitions the force away from scripted demonstrations toward realistic, unscripted combat scenarios to prepare for informationised and intelligentised warfare.

Initiated with the establishment of the Sanjie Training Base in 1986, this multi-decade doctrinal evolution has expanded into a sophisticated network of Combined Tactics Training Bases, including Zhurihe and Queshan. Under the current model, individual proficiency developed in Basic Training serves as the foundation for Combined Arms Training, which utilizes unit integration, tactical coordination, and opposition validation to prepare forces for joint maneuvers. Recent exercises, such as the Grassland Partners-2026 joint training with Mongolia, demonstrate this integration in practice through the coordinated deployment of manned-unmanned assault squads utilizing robotic ground vehicles and drones under unified tactical command.

Comment

The integration of 'robot wolves' and reconnaissance drones during the Grassland Partners-2026 exercise demonstrates how the PLA's Unit Integration Training is translating intelligentised warfare concepts into squad-level tactics. By embedding these unmanned systems directly within the 81st Group Army's mechanised infantry squads, Chinese planners are bypassing the traditional reliance on regimental or brigade-level support assets. This structural decentralisation demands a higher baseline of technical proficiency from individual squad leaders, challenging the historically top-down command culture of the PLA Ground Force.

To read in details click here

China’s Moment of Weakness: Economic Decay and America’s Strategic Opening

Foreign Affairs | Logan Wright

China is experiencing a systemic decay of its fiscal and financial systems, forcing Beijing to rely heavily on cheap exports to sustain growth as its domestic property sector collapses. This domestic slowdown has reduced China’s share of global GDP to approximately 15 percent, while the United States has expanded its economic share to 26 percent.

The contraction of credit flows, which previously fueled state-led infrastructure projects, has left Chinese banks burdened with a $72 trillion banking system debt and severely restricted Beijing's capacity to stimulate domestic household demand. To maintain growth, Beijing is leveraging a massive $1.2 trillion global trade surplus, while simultaneously threatening retaliatory measures against Western de-risking policies to keep foreign markets open. This export surge threatens to erode Western industrial bases, but it also presents Washington and its allies with a strategic opportunity to constrain Beijing through targeted trade barriers and aggressive domestic industrial investments.

Comment

Plummeting tax revenues and a decaying renminbi-denominated credit market will force the Central Military Commission to rationalise PLA modernisation. While Beijing has historically shielded high-priority projects like the Chengdu J-20 stealth fighter from budgetary fluctuations, sustained fiscal deficits of nearly ten per cent of GDP limit the long-term sustainability of such massive procurement cycles. Consequently, the PLA Navy's ambitious carrier strike group programme centred around the Fujian aircraft carrier may face prolonged development timelines. This financial friction suggests that China's capacity to sustain a high-tempo, multi-domain arms race with the United States will increasingly depend on cannibalising civilian industrial sectors rather than relying on organic economic growth.

To read in details click here

Türkiye–PRC Railway Partnership Bolsters Middle Corridor

Eurasia Daily Monitor | Vusal Guliyev

Türkiye’s Pasifik ISR and China’s Guangzhou Communications Investment signed a railway cooperation agreement on June 10 to establish regular freight services along the Middle Corridor. This bilateral transport deal aims to secure trans-Eurasian supply chains against maritime disruptions in the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz.

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has severely degraded the viability of the Northern Corridor, forcing international logistics operators to seek alternative overland transit channels. By utilizing this 6,500-kilometer multimodal trade artery, Beijing and Ankara plan to run 1,000 freight trains annually, integrating Turkish infrastructure like the Marmaray Tunnel with Chinese manufacturing hubs. This expansion directly benefits transit states like Azerbaijan and Georgia, which are modernizing the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars railway to accommodate a container traffic volume that tripled in 2025, ultimately reducing delivery times between East Asia and European markets while bypassing Russian territory and enhancing regional economic integration.

Comment

The expansion of scheduled block trains along the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars railway exposes the severe capacity bottlenecks of the Caspian Sea maritime transit segment. While overland rail links bypass sanctioned Russian territory, the physical limitations of port infrastructure in Baku and Aktau restrict rapid throughput scaling. Consequently, trans-Eurasian logistics remain highly vulnerable to weather-induced delays and vessel shortages on the Trans-Caspian route. This operational friction prevents the Middle Corridor from fully replacing traditional maritime shipping lanes despite the growing frequency of bilateral transport agreements.

To read in details click here

Evolution, Not Revolution: Why China Isn’t Pushing Its Cleantech Advantage in the Hormuz Crisis

Council on Foreign Relations  |  David Hart

China has significantly reduced its fossil fuel imports following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, deliberately moderating global oil price spikes rather than leveraging the crisis to aggressively boost its clean energy exports. While maximizing oil price pain could have accelerated global sales of Chinese solar panels, batteries, and electric vehicles, Beijing prioritized broader economic stability.

This restraint stems from the structural reality that these clean technologies constituted only 6 percent of the nation's 3.77 trillion dollar total export portfolio in 2025. As the primary trading partner for over 120 nations, any diversion of global capital toward expensive fossil fuels directly diminishes foreign purchasing power for its dominant traditional exports like electronics, chemicals, and metals. Consequently, the resulting global slowdown threatens the export revenues driving almost all Chinese economic growth. Ultimately, while the blockade will likely accelerate long-term global cleantech adoption to mitigate energy security risks, Beijing remains constrained by immediate macroeconomic dependencies.

Comment

Beijing’s response to the Strait of Hormuz closure exposes a fundamental strategic trade-off between promoting its 'new three' clean energy exports and protecting its massive traditional manufacturing base. While a prolonged energy crisis would theoretically drive global demand for Chinese solar panels and electric vehicles, the immediate inflationary shock to oil-importing trade partners would devastate the broader consumer demand required to sustain China's multi-trillion-dollar industrial export engine. Consequently, the Chinese Communist Party balances the long-term geopolitical leverage of its green technology monopoly against the immediate survival of its domestic manufacturing sector.

To read in details click here

Europe urgently needs cohesion on 'high-risk' technology vendors

Euractiv  |  Jamie MacColl, Natasha Buckley

Germany and Spain are actively resisting European Commission proposals to amend the EU Cyber Security Act and ban Chinese "high-risk" technology vendors like Huawei from critical infrastructure, according to reporting by Bloomberg. This pushback threatens to undermine a centralized European framework designed to secure 18 sectors from systemic cyber threats.

National resistance stems from deep-seated economic dependencies, with one estimate indicating Chinese equipment comprises 58% of Germany's 5G radio access networks. Spain has also integrated Huawei into its judicial wiretapping systems and actively pursued investment by Chinese technology companies in strategic sectors like renewable energy and electric vehicles. Under China's 2017 National Intelligence Law, these technology vendors are legally compelled to cooperate with Beijing's intelligence services, creating unquantifiable security risks. While the Commission seeks to centralize powers to shield member states from economic retaliation, overcoming domestic opposition remains a critical hurdle for European cohesion.

Comment

Berlin's retention of Huawei equipment across 58% of its 5G radio access networks directly undermines the collective security objectives of the EU Cyber Security Act. This fragmentation allows Beijing to exploit bilateral economic leverage, particularly through targeted investments in Spain's renewable energy sector, to fracture consensus on technology security. Spain's integration of Huawei into its judicial wiretapping systems creates potential entry points for state-sponsored espionage, bypassing the security perimeters of neighbouring European partners. Consequently, the lack of a unified enforcement mechanism under the EU Cyber Security Act ensures that national economic priorities will continue to supersede collective security commitments.

To read in details click here

The strategic competition with China: winning the multi-domain race

SpaceNews Thomas “Tav” Taverney

The United States must rapidly integrate emerging technologies and expand its industrial capacity to counter China’s comprehensive Military-Civil Fusion strategy and maintain multi-domain military superiority. This strategic competition spans critical warfighting domains, requiring immediate advancements in cyber operations, artificial intelligence, space superiority, layered missile defense, and counter-drone systems to prevent operational surprise.

Historically, military dominance relied on numerical overmatch, but modern warfare increasingly prioritises technological agility and the ability to sustain prolonged combat operations amidst rapid attrition. To secure these capabilities, agencies like the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, United States Cyber Command, and the Golden Dome for America Office are coordinating public-private partnerships, while the Space Force and Missile Defense Agency deploy resilient orbital sensors and advanced interceptors. Ultimately, sustaining credible deterrence against Beijing depends on the nation's capacity to accelerate commercial innovation, secure supply chains, and out-manufacture adversaries during extended conflicts.

Comment

The establishment of the Golden Dome for America Office reveals a growing recognition that homeland defence requires a unified architectural approach. Integrating disparate systems like Patriot, THAAD, and Aegis into a single resilient network addresses long-standing interoperability gaps. However, this consolidation places immense pressure on software-defined command networks to process multi-domain sensor data in real time. This integrated architecture remains vulnerable to pre-emptive cyber disruption.

To read in details click here

The Iran Cease-Fire Was Doomed to Fail: Why Transactionalism Won’t Deliver Peace in the Middle East

Foreign Affairs | Neil Quilliam and Sanam Vakil

The June 2026 memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran has collapsed, reigniting direct missile and drone strikes and shutting down commercial shipping through the strategic Strait of Hormuz. This breakdown threatens to trigger a wider regional escalation as the Houthis impose a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia.

This failure stems from a flawed reliance on transactional diplomacy, which prioritises short-term, standalone bargains over the institutional frameworks and difficult political compromises needed to resolve deep-seated security dilemmas. Similar to the geopolitical dynamics preceding World War I, modern leaders like Donald Trump have pursued narrow, personalized deals that bypass long-term strategy and leave core conflicts unresolved. Consequently, temporary cease-fires in Gaza and bilateral agreements in the Gulf have merely allowed adversaries to reconstitute their forces, leaving the Middle East highly vulnerable to cascading, interconnected conflicts that disrupt the global economy and energy markets.

Comment

The collapse of the US-Iran memorandum exposes the fragility of security frameworks built on transactional normalisation rather than formal, integrated defence treaties. By prioritising bilateral trade and diplomatic recognition in agreements like the Abraham Accords, participating states inadvertently decoupled regional integration from the resolution of core territorial disputes. This structural decoupling leaves partners vulnerable to asymmetric retaliation from non-state actors like the Houthis, who exploit the lack of collective defence guarantees to disrupt maritime chokepoints. Consequently, these loose Middle Eastern alignments fail to project credible deterrence against Tehran, as regional adversaries exploit the absence of a unified, US-backed air and missile defence command.

To read in details click here

Iranian Missiles And Drones Target Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan After US Night Of Bombing

Eurasia Review

Iranian missiles and drones targeted US military facilities in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan on Friday, escalating regional hostilities following thirteen consecutive nights of American airstrikes against Iran. The strikes targeted critical installations, including Isa Air Base and Al-Azraq base, threatening to disrupt Western security infrastructure and international shipping lanes.

This multi-directional bombardment represents a direct response to US Central Command's ongoing aerial campaign designed to degrade Tehran's capability to restrict transit through the Strait of Hormuz. Simultaneously, Yemen's Houthi rebels expanded the conflict's maritime dimension by attacking Saudi oil tankers and threatening to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, driving global Brent crude prices above $100 per barrel. These coordinated actions demonstrate a dual-chokepoint denial strategy aimed at choking global energy supplies and container traffic. While Iraq attempts to mediate peace, the widening theater of operations increases the risk of a protracted conflict across the Middle East.

Comment

The simultaneous targeting of Isa Air Base in Bahrain and Al-Azraq base in Jordan exposes the vulnerability of forward-deployed American logistics hubs to saturation strikes by Iranian one-way attack munitions. By forcing Jordan and Bahrain to activate domestic air defences, Tehran is testing the political tolerance of regional hosts. This complicates the Royal Jordanian Air Force's airspace coordination with American batteries during low-altitude drone ingress. Consequently, the geographical dispersion of these strikes dilutes the localized air defence coverage of the Gulf Cooperation Council states, forcing a defensive reallocation of Patriot interceptor assets.

To read in details click here

The Bomber Paradox: The B-21, Nuclear Deterrence, and the Risk of Legacy Defense Assumptions

Modern War Institute | Hannah Jude-Smith, Shane Praiswater and Brian Leitzke

The United States military faces a critical strategic dilemma as it integrates the B-21 Raider into a force posture designed to simultaneously deter Russia and China. Holding this advanced stealth bomber in nuclear reserve during a peer conflict risks severely weakening American conventional striking power in highly contested antiaccess and area-denial environments.

Historically, institutional friction within Strategic Air Command during the Korean and Vietnam Wars demonstrated a persistent reluctance to commit strategic bombers to theater commanders. Applying the escalation theories of Thomas Schelling and Robert Powell, however, reveals that aggressively employing these dual-role platforms conventionally actually enhances deterrence by demonstrating resolve. Ultimately, relying on other modernized legs of the nuclear triad—such as the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile and low-yield submarine-launched weapons—allows the joint force to fully leverage the Raider's revolutionary conventional capabilities without hollowing out its strategic deterrent or risking inadvertent escalation.

Comment

The doctrinal insistence on holding the B-21 Raider in nuclear reserve underutilises its unique open-architecture systems in high-intensity conventional campaigns. Tying this platform to static deterrence degrades the immediate conventional strike capacity required to penetrate Chinese deep-inland air defence networks. This conventional deficit increases the likelihood of early escalation in a Western Pacific conflict. This forces a reliance on the Trident D5-deployed W76-2 low-yield warhead to achieve theatre-level deterrence.

To read in details click here

Space Force Wants Commercial Bandwidth for SATCOM Experiments

Air & Space Forces Magazine  |  Courtney Albon

The United States Space Force is seeking commercial bandwidth to support its satellite communications (SATCOM) experiments as of July 24, 2026. This initiative aims to integrate commercial capabilities with military systems, potentially leveraging platforms like the Boeing-built Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) satellite to enhance tactical connectivity for deployed forces.

Historically, military satellite communications relied almost exclusively on dedicated, government-owned constellations that face capacity constraints and vulnerability to electronic warfare. By incorporating commercial bandwidth, the service intends to test and evaluate hybrid architectures that can dynamically distribute data traffic across diverse orbital regimes. This approach is designed to improve network redundancy, reduce transmission latency, and mitigate the risk of single-point failures during potential high-intensity conflicts with near-peer adversaries. The integration of commercial services also allows the military to rapidly adopt technological innovations from the private sector. Ultimately, these experimental campaigns will help define future procurement strategies, resource allocation, and operational doctrines for contested space environments.

Comment

The US Space Force's pivot towards commercial bandwidth experiments reflects an operational transition towards hybrid orbital architectures. Utilising commercial high-throughput satellites alongside the Boeing-built Mobile User Objective System diversifies military transmission pathways. This dual-use integration reduces the susceptibility of the legacy MUOS constellation to targeted electronic jamming. Ultimately, these bandwidth trials will define the technical parameters for future multi-orbit military communication networks.

To read in details click here

Hegseth’s conflicting statements, evasions drain lawmakers’ patience, support

Defense One | Patrick Tucker

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faced intense bipartisan criticism from senators during a congressional hearing over the Trump administration's shifting rationales for the war on Iran. This growing legislative frustration threatens the White House's unprecedented $1.5 trillion defense-spending request as public and political support for Operation Epic Fury rapidly declines.

The congressional pushback reflects deeper anxieties regarding the strategic management of unexpected conflicts and the lack of transparency over $75 billion in previously appropriated but unobligated funds. While lawmakers broadly support core budget pillars like replacing munitions stockpiles and advancing acquisition reform, Hegseth's evasive testimony regarding Iranian drone capabilities and nuclear progress has severely eroded legislative trust. Meanwhile, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine defended the massive 2027 budget request as a vital capital investment to counter the growing alignment between China, Russia, and Iran, comparing the current mobilization effort to the historic pre-World War II buildup.

Comment

The legislative friction over the $75 billion in unobligated Pentagon funds exposes a critical disconnect in US defence economics during active operations. Unaccounted capital undermines the credibility of the White House's unprecedented $1.5 trillion base budget request. This fiscal opacity directly complicates procurement planning for munitions essential to Operation Epic Fury. Ultimately, congressional skepticism of the executive's war aims threatens funding pipelines for Gen. Dan Caine's proposed force modernisation.

To read in details click here

The Case for Letting Teenagers Say Stupid Things

The Atlantic

American high schools are increasingly suppressing student free expression within student newspapers, student governments, and daily campus life, creating a systemic chilling effect that trains young people to remain silent. This institutional silencing threatens to leave students unprepared for active participation in the public sphere. While educators grapple with a free fall in literacy, rising truancy, and mental-health crises, the erosion of student speech remains a critical yet overlooked vulnerability.

In Washington, D.C., student journalists actively contest this trend by reporting on local controversies, including phone bans, faculty changes, and academic policies. These young writers argue that navigating real-world debates over grade inflation, artificial intelligence, and school administration is essential for civic development. Ultimately, suppressing these early attempts at public discourse deprives teenagers of the opportunity to learn from their mistakes, undermining the foundational role of educational institutions in fostering a democratic society.

Comment

The Active Measures Working Group, established by the US State Department in 1981, historically demonstrated that public awareness and open debate are the primary shields against foreign disinformation. Systemic suppression of student expression in American high schools directly undermines this traditional model of societal resilience. By discouraging critical inquiry at an early age, educational institutions inadvertently degrade the domestic cognitive environment that national security organisations rely on to counter foreign influence. This domestic silencing of youth voices creates a vulnerable public sphere, ultimately easing the penetration of hostile psychological operations targeting future electorates.

Why the United States and Iran Keep Fighting While They Negotiate

Center for Strategic and International Studies  |  Emily Harding

Iran and the United States are actively employing a "talk-fight" strategy, utilizing simultaneous military strikes and diplomatic channels to secure leverage in ongoing bilateral negotiations. This dual-track approach rejects traditional ceasefire-first diplomacy, treating localized violence not as a negotiation spoiler but as a direct medium for communicating political resolve and redlines.

Historically, conventional diplomatic pauses often stall over procedural preconditions, whereas concurrent military friction forces both adversaries to continuously clarify their actual thresholds for concessions. While Washington leverages overwhelming conventional military superiority to signal deterrence, Tehran exploits its asymmetric capability to disrupt shipping lanes in the Strait of Hormuz to offset economic pressure. However, this high-stakes bargaining model risks severe miscalculation, particularly if American strikes target critical Iranian infrastructure like the Kharg Island oil terminal, or if the regime misjudges Washington's long-term operational patience amidst global economic disruptions. Consequently, both capitals are likely to sustain this volatile equilibrium, balancing tactical aggression with backchannel diplomacy to avoid total war.

Comment

The simultaneous deployment of kinetic strikes alongside backchannel diplomacy represents a formalised bargaining doctrine for the Islamic Republic of Iran. By targeting shipping near the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran uses controlled escalation to shape its negotiating leverage. This approach assumes Washington will tolerate localised disruption rather than strike critical infrastructure like the Kharg Island oil terminal. Consequently, the efficacy of this Iranian doctrine depends entirely on preventing American retaliation from triggering a devastating conventional response.

To read in details click here

The Mess the Iran War Made

The Atlantic  |  Andrew Exum

The United States has failed to achieve its political objectives in its war against Iran, resulting in a severely deteriorated security environment across the Middle East. Despite claims of a historic military victory by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the conflict has ultimately empowered a more extreme, less cautious leadership in Tehran.

This leadership transition occurred after the replacement of the former cautious supreme leader, fundamentally shifting the regional balance of power. Consequently, critical maritime chokepoints have been compromised, with the Strait of Hormuz largely closed and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait blocked by Houthi forces in Yemen. Although a temporary reduction in Chinese oil imports briefly forestalled immediate energy shortages, major corporations like Exxon and Chevron now warn that a severe global energy crunch is inevitable. If these vital shipping lanes remain blocked, oil prices could spike to unprecedented levels, threatening the stability of the entire global economy.

Comment

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait exposes the severe limitations of relying on temporary maritime coalitions like Operation Prosperity Guardian to secure global trade. The inability of the U.S. Fifth Fleet to suppress Houthi anti-ship ballistic missile launches from Yemen demonstrates the limits of traditional carrier strike group deployments against land-based drone and missile arsenals. This operational paralysis reveals how low-cost Iranian-designed loitering munitions can effectively decouple American naval power from the Persian Gulf. Consequently, the prolonged blockade of these waterways forces commercial shipping to bypass the Suez Canal entirely, permanently altering global maritime logistics.

To read in details click here

Nearly a Million Tajiks Have Taken Russian Citizenship Affecting Both Countries

The Jamestown Foundation  |  Paul Goble

More than 800,000 Tajik citizens have acquired Russian citizenship over the past decade, leveraging a unique bilateral agreement to secure dual nationality. This massive demographic shift has severely constrained Moscow's capacity to regulate Central Asian migration while triggering intense domestic backlash over the perceived dilution of Russian national identity.

The legal foundation for this influx rests on the 1995 Dual Citizenship Agreement, a unique post-Soviet accord originally intended as a blueprint for regional integration. While Russian businesses remain heavily dependent on this migrant labor force, political figures like Sergey Mironov warn that the trend threatens domestic cohesion. Simultaneously, Dushanbe relies on remittances, which constitute approximately 50 percent of Tajikistan's gross domestic product, to maintain economic viability. Despite rising xenophobia and domestic pressure to abrogate the treaty, the Kremlin is highly likely to preserve the arrangement to prevent alienating Central Asian partners and to maintain its geopolitical influence across the former Soviet space.

Comment

Moscow's retention of the 1995 Dual Citizenship Agreement exposes a fundamental tension between domestic security anxieties and the Kremlin's broader geopolitical ambitions in Central Asia. While domestic political factions push to restrict Tajik migration to preserve ethnic cohesion, any unilateral abrogation of this treaty by Russia would instantly degrade its diplomatic leverage over Dushanbe. This policy dilemma forces Russian decision-makers to accept localised social friction in exchange for maintaining the critical labour flows required to sustain their sanctioned industrial economy. Ultimately, the preservation of these open-border mechanisms reveals that regional hegemony and economic survival consistently override internal nationalist demands within the Russian state apparatus.

To read in details click here

Hibernating Bear

Center for a New American Security | Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Peter Schroeder and Kate Johnston

Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has forced Moscow to ruthlessly prioritize its strategic interests and reduce its tolerance for risk, leading to non-intervention in recent crises across Syria, Nagorno-Karabakh, Venezuela, and Iran. Despite significant manpower and equipment losses, the core pillars of Russian expeditionary reach—including strategic airlift, long-range strike assets, and logistics networks—remain structurally intact.

This operational restraint reflects a deliberate concentration of military, fiscal, and escalation bandwidth within a single high-intensity theater to avoid simultaneous contingencies. While the ongoing conflict limits large-scale deployments elsewhere, the Kremlin retains the capacity to project lower-intensity power globally and could still deploy robust force packages to critical regions like Belarus and the Arctic. Once the war concludes, the Kremlin's enduring great power strategic culture and highly active defense industrial base will likely drive a rapid restoration of its global power projection capabilities, especially if post-war European deterrence commitments falter.

Comment

Turkey's invocation of the 1936 Montreux Convention to close the Turkish Straits has severely disrupted the maritime logistics pipeline sustaining the Russian naval facility in Tartus, Syria. Without direct Black Sea access, naval replenishment relies on circuitous, high-cost routes from the Baltic or Northern Fleets, exposing the limits of Russian blue-water sustainment under prolonged regional denial. This Black Sea bottleneck demonstrates how Turkish maritime control can isolate the Tartus outpost while Russian logistics are heavily consumed by the Ukrainian land campaign. Consequently, the long-term viability of Moscow's Mediterranean presence hinges entirely on political arrangements rather than organic power projection capabilities.

To read in details click here

It's one choke point after another in the global economy

MSN | Emily Peck

Global maritime chokepoints face consecutive disruptions that threaten to destabilise international trade routes and exacerbate systemic economic vulnerabilities. These persistent bottlenecks, spanning critical waterways from the Red Sea to the Panama Canal, compound transit delays and elevate shipping costs worldwide. This cascading vulnerability stems from a highly integrated global trade architecture that relies on just-in-time delivery systems and concentrated shipping lanes.

As geopolitical tensions and climate-induced disruptions simultaneously restrict passage through these vital conduits, the operational resilience of global manufacturing and energy distribution networks is severely tested. The resulting inflationary pressures and supply chain bottlenecks force multinational corporations to re-evaluate nearshoring strategies and diversify their logistics portfolios to mitigate future operational risks. Ultimately, these recurring maritime disruptions signal a long-term transition toward a more fragmented global trading system, where economic security is increasingly defined by the physical security of critical transit corridors.

Comment

The protracted disruption of the Bab-el-Mandeb strait exposes the limits of multinational maritime coalitions like Operation Prosperity Guardian to secure commercial transit against asymmetric threats. This persistent vulnerability forces shipping conglomerates to rely on the Cape of Good Hope route, structurally altering global maritime logistics by extending voyages by up to fourteen days. This prolonged diversion around Africa directly increases fuel consumption and carbon emissions, compounding the financial burden on merchant fleets.

To read in details click here

Inside Ukraine’s Kill Zone, Where Drones Hunt Everything That Moves

Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute  |  David Kirichenko

The Unmanned Systems Battalion of Ukraine’s 110th Separate Mechanized Brigade is deploying advanced first-person-view (FPV) drones and ground robots to navigate highly contested frontlines where Russian aerial surveillance has rendered traditional logistics virtually impossible. These unmanned systems now perform critical resupply and medical evacuation missions in the lethal kill zone behind the front, where any human movement triggers immediate strikes.

This technological shift reflects a broader transition toward robotic warfare, as both sides employ electronic jamming and automated platforms to survive. In devastated areas like Kostyantynivka, the presence of fiber-optic drones and constant jamming has eliminated the margin for error, forcing soldiers to rely on unmanned ground vehicles for survival. Ultimately, these rapid technological developments demonstrate how autonomous systems are redefining tactical endurance, frontline logistics, and casualty evacuation in modern high-intensity conflicts, signaling a future where human presence on the physical battlefield is increasingly minimized and contested.

Comment

The deployment of unmanned ground vehicles by the 110th Separate Mechanised Brigade along the Dnipro-Zaporizhzhia-Donetsk axis reveals a fundamental shift in frontline logistics within highly contested environments. Traditional supply lines in sectors like Kostyantynivka are increasingly untenable under persistent aerial surveillance, forcing a reliance on automated systems for casualty evacuation and ammunition delivery. This transition in the Donbas theatre exposes the vulnerability of legacy transport networks to cheap, ubiquitous aerial threats. Consequently, Ukrainian tactical endurance in these contested sectors is becoming directly contingent on the scale and resilience of robotic resupply fleets.

To read in details click here

Ukraine’s remarkable anti-populism

International Institute for Strategic Studies  |  Nigel Gould-Davies

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy replaced General Oleksandr Syrskyi with Major-General Mykhailo Drapatyi as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces on 21 July 2026, following intense public protests over the dismissal of Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov. This leadership transition represents a critical victory for Ukrainian civil society and a pivotal moment for the nation's wartime military leadership.

The restructuring addresses deep-seated friction between reformist political leaders and conservative military echelons resistant to cultural modernisation. While Ukraine has excelled in rapid technological innovation and battlefield adaptation, its internal military structures remain burdened by Soviet-era micromanagement and centralized control. The new commander's appointment, alongside Lieutenant-General Kyrylo Budanov's leadership of the Presidential Administration, signals a generational shift toward decentralized mission command. Ultimately, this transition demonstrates the unique capacity of Ukraine's disciplined civil society to correct governance errors under martial law, reinforcing domestic stability and long-term operational resilience against Russian aggression.

Comment

The elevation of Major-General Mykhailo Drapatyi to Commander-in-Chief represents a decisive attempt to purge lingering Soviet-era command structures within the Ukrainian Armed Forces. While frontline Ukrainian units have pioneered decentralised drone operations, senior echelons have frequently stifled this tactical agility through rigid, top-down micromanagement. By pairing Drapatyi with reformists like Kyrylo Budanov, Kyiv aims to institutionalise mission command across all operational sectors. This command transition will determine whether the Ukrainian General Staff can scale the tactical successes of its independent drone units into a theatre-wide offensive strategy against Russian forces.

To read in details click here

Gas from Above: How UAVs Are Bringing Chemical Warfare Back to the Battlefield in Ukraine

Small Wars Journal | Patrick Senft

Russian and Ukrainian combatants are deploying commercial unmanned aerial vehicles to deliver chemical munitions on the battlefield, marking the first large-scale tactical integration of drone-dropped irritants in active combat. This emerging method bypasses traditional defenses by dropping gas grenades directly into fortified positions to incapacitate soldiers and force them into the open.

Historically, defense contractors developed these delivery systems for domestic riot control, but the stagnation of the frontline has driven both militaries to adapt the technology for offensive trench-clearing operations. Combatants frequently employ Soviet-era K-51 and newly manufactured Russian RG-Vo (РГ-Во) grenades containing CS or CN tear gas, often coordinating these drops with secondary explosive drone strikes or artillery barrages to target fleeing personnel. Although classified as less-lethal riot control agents, their battlefield deployment directly violates the international Chemical Weapons Convention, to which both nations are states parties, raising significant legal challenges and escalating the overall brutality of the invasion of Ukraine.

Comment

Deploying the newly manufactured RG-Vo gas grenade via quadcopter platforms demonstrates how Russian tactical doctrine has formalised the use of irritant agents to solve the tactical deadlock of entrenched positions. This low-cost aerial dispersal method, which pairs the RG-Vo with FPV kamikaze drones, converts standard riot control agents into highly lethal force multipliers. By systematically utilising these aerosol delivery systems to flush defenders into open terrain, Russian forces are establishing a precedent that erodes the normative boundaries established by the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention.

To read in details click here