Global Economics Intelligence executive summary, July 2026

McKinsey & Company  |  Arvind Govindarajan, Shubham Singhal, Sven Smit, Jeffrey Condon, Krzysztof Kwiatkowski

Central banks across major economies maintained rate pauses in July 2026 as Middle East geopolitical tensions drove Brent crude past $118 per barrel before prices settled around $80. US consumer price inflation slowed to 3.5% year over year in June while Eurozone energy import costs surged 10%, generating volatile trade deficits and elevated supply chain stress.

Elevated shipping disruptions and fragmented trade policy worsened these macroeconomic pressures across key developed and emerging markets. The United States enacted targeted 10% tariffs on unexempted Mexican goods outside the USMCA while applying 25% tariffs to select Brazilian imports. Global supply chain pressures remained significantly elevated through June 2026. Meanwhile, the McKinsey Global Institute reported that global balance sheet assets reached nearly $1.8 quadrillion in 2025, warning that detached asset valuations across China and the United States risk forced market corrections through persistent inflation or valuation losses.

Comment

The imposition of selective non-partner tariffs alongside existing exceptions under the USMCA illustrates a calculated strategic trade-off between protecting domestic manufacturing and preserving regional trade corridors. Washington's decision to carve out automotive and steel products under Section 232 demonstrates how targeted trade policy seeks to shield key industrial inputs while penalising non-compliant commodity flows. This balance attempt reveals the structural tension between enforcing bilateral trade leverage and maintaining cross-border supply integration across North America.

As targeted tariff boundaries harden outside the USMCA framework, nearshoring capital flows risk fragmenting across secondary manufacturing nodes in Latin America. Supply chains designed around duty-free access are forced to re-route intermediate components through exempt channels, increasing transaction costs for North American supply lines. Ultimately, this structural friction threatens the long-term cost competitiveness of industrial manufacturing hubs dependent on Section 232 carve-outs.

Strategic Question for Discussion

Which factor places greater long-term strain on North American industrial competitiveness — the transaction costs created by tariff enforcement outside the USMCA framework, or the policy uncertainty generated by selective Section 232 exemptions?

The available trade data suggests that transaction costs outside the USMCA framework create immediate operational friction, but selective Section 232 exemptions impose a far more damaging long-term chill on capital investment. When trade compliance relies on discretionary executive exemptions, industrial manufacturers delay multi-year supply chain reorganisations in favour of short-term hedging. Consequently, regulatory unpredictability around tariff enforcement poses the primary structural threat to regional manufacturing integration.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here