China in the crossfire as US widens economic warfare on Iran

Asia Times | Jeff Pao

The U.S. Department of the Treasury launched Operation Economic Outcast on August 24, designating 16 Hong Kong- and Shenzhen-based entities to sever financial and logistical networks sustaining Iran. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that any institution facilitating money laundering for Tehran faces complete removal from the U.S. dollar system.

This expanding campaign threatens independent Chinese refiners in Shandong that rely on Iranian crude exports. Chinese refiners face severe operational friction. Shandong ports turn away tankers while local banks restrict trade financing. Beijing seeks to protect domestic energy security while benefiting from an extended Middle Eastern conflict that drains American missile stockpiles. Pentagon war games indicate five months of combat consume over 1,500 Patriot interceptors costing $4 million each. Washington's campaign threatens global supply chains and could push crude oil past $100 per barrel ahead of the September 24 summit between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping.

Comment

Expenditure rates for MIM-104 Patriot interceptors in Middle Eastern air defence operations expose severe structural limits in Western munition production facilities. Lockheed Martin annual output for PAC-3 MSE missiles remains capped at roughly 500 units per year, creating an unavoidable net deficit when theater consumption exceeds 1,500 rounds within five months. Ground-based air defence units defending Gulf infrastructure draw down US inventories far faster than domestic industrial bases can replenish them.

A similar industrial bottleneck emerged during Operation Unified Protector in 2011, when European air forces exhausted precision-guided munitions within weeks. That Libyan intervention demonstrated how NATO stockpiles collapse when combat sorties outpace production capacity at manufacturers like MBDA.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If PAC-3 MSE consumption in the Middle East continues to exceed Lockheed Martin production capacity, will Western planners prioritize theater air defence in the Persian Gulf or retain interceptor inventory for potential Western Pacific contingencies?

The available evidence points toward defense planners rationing PAC-3 MSE allocations to preserve deterrence capacity in the Indo-Pacific theater. Extended high-rate depletion in Middle Eastern engagements risks degrading the air defence envelope around critical US bases in Japan and Guam. Consequently, commanders will likely accept higher risk profiles around Gulf energy infrastructure rather than deplete strategic war reserves.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here