Is China Working Against US Data Centers?

National Interest | Edward Owen

Chinese Communist Party-linked actors are actively amplifying anti-data center opposition across the United States to slow domestic artificial intelligence development and narrow Washington's technological lead. Information operations leverage network funding and digital tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT to push environmental and ethical arguments against infrastructure expansion. Data centers power critical artificial intelligence models.

In April 2026, CCP-linked academics Zeng Yi and Xue Lan addressed Capitol Hill during discussions on stalling American data center construction. Financial investigations from the Bitcoin Policy Institute further link Chinese-backed entities, including Neville Roy Singham's Tricontinental Institute for Social Research, to left-wing anti-infrastructure campaigns. Chinese actors also created synthetic comic strips disguised as local Maryland news outlets to influence regional public sentiment. Sub-national narrative warfare aims to make domestic technological expansion significantly more expensive and politically contested. Unchecked disruption risks allowing Beijing's technology stack to dominate international markets and draw allied states into its techno-economic orbit.

Comment

Cognitive influence operations targeting dual-use critical infrastructure represent a low-cost asymmetric mechanism to delay sovereign capability deployment. By leveraging covert funding channels through organisations such as the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research, adversarial actors exploit open democratic regulatory processes to induce domestic political friction. This indirect vector converts local environmental oversight and municipal zoning debates into cognitive speed bumps against national computing capacity.

The downstream operational consequence of this cognitive delay manifests in slower model iteration cycles for defense-adjacent computational workloads. When local opposition successfully stalls server farm construction, the resulting latency cascades through private-sector dual-use development pipelines, delaying national sovereign AI integrations. Consequently, local municipal zoning delays directly constrain high-performance computing clusters required for real-time sensor processing across operational commands like USINDOPACOM.

Strategic Question for Discussion

Which factor presents a greater operational vulnerability for Western technological dominance — direct export controls on high-end hardware, or covert cognitive operations by entities like the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research targeting domestic compute infrastructure?

The available evidence points toward covert cognitive operations presenting the more insidious long-term risk, as hardware controls generate immediate policy workarounds while infrastructure delays create permanent compounding capacity deficits. When adversarial funding vectors successfully exploit local regulatory mechanisms, the resulting compute latency directly degrades dual-use software development timelines. My assessment is that administrative friction induced at the municipal level will prove far harder to remediate than supply chain disruptions across treaty partner networks.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here