Review: Shadows Over Kabul by Hamdullah Mohib and Tam Hussein

Small Wars Journal | Gillian MacIntosh

Shadows Over Kabul: An Insider’s Account of the Fall of the Afghan Republic, authored by former Afghan National Security Advisor Hamdullah Mohib and investigative journalist Tam Hussein, offers a retrospective study spanning Afghanistan's modern history from the 1979 Soviet invasion to the 2021 government collapse. The 248-page memoir published by Bloomsbury Publishing traces Mohib's trajectory from refugee to politician, detailing his tenure as ambassador to the United States and National Security Advisor while examining foreign intervention, internal political discord, and the Pashtunwali cultural framework.

The work chronicles pivotal moments including the U.S.-Taliban Deal, the exclusion of the Afghan government from negotiations, the release of five thousand Taliban prisoners, and the rapid U.S. troop withdrawal. The text contrasts the Soviet-Afghan War with the multi-front pressures that fractured the Afghan Republic through disinformation and eroding trust. Ultimately, the publication provides an insider account illuminating how external forces and internal decisions shaped the fate of the Afghan state over forty-five years.

Comment

Memoirs by ousted principals during state collapses often function as post-hoc exculpations, yet the inclusion of investigative framing by Tam Hussein shifts the text toward a structural critique of internal governance deficits. The mechanics of the 2020 US-Taliban Deal signed in Doha bypassed the Afghan Republic entirely, accelerating an already advanced erosion of institutional legitimacy and command cohesion within the Afghan National Army.

That marginalisation mirrors historical patron-client fractures, recalling the rapid unraveling of the Republic of Vietnam's armed forces following the 1973 Paris Peace Accords.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If bilateral negotiations between external patrons and insurgent forces systematically exclude incumbent regimes, how resilient can any indigenous security apparatus remain under accelerated withdrawal timelines?

The historical record suggests that institutional collapse becomes nearly structural once allied security guarantees are detached from local political survival. When external actors negotiate directly with belligerents, indigenous forces rapidly lose the operational momentum required to sustain protracted counterinsurgency campaigns.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here