Future C2 and Counter-C2 systems

RAND Corporation | Henri van Soest, Maria Chiara Aquilino, Scott Warnier, James Black

Non-nuclear command and control (C2) systems are undergoing rapid digitisation that threatens to undermine global strategic stability by accelerating operational decision-making beyond human capacity. While artificial intelligence, advanced sensing, and commercial cloud infrastructure strengthen resilience, they simultaneously expand cyber attack surfaces and elevate the risk of pre-emptive crisis miscalculation.

Legacy military structures, siloed data systems, and divergent organizational cultures currently hinder the seamless integration of these automated technologies. Counter-C2 tools favour disruption. Consequently, reliance on commercial satellite networks introduces unaligned private incentives and complicates attribution during counter-C2 operations like jamming or cyber-attacks. To mitigate these vulnerabilities, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office recommends that allied defence ministries establish interoperable data standards, map critical commercial dependencies, and preserve national sovereignty. Ultimately, soft governance measures, including shared allied research, joint experimentation, and robust crisis communication channels, offer the most viable pathway to prevent pre-emptive escalation.

Comment

The integration of commercial cloud architectures into the United States military's JADC2 framework fundamentally alters traditional hierarchical command structures. Under this Joint All-Domain Command and Control initiative, the reliance on commercial satellite constellations like Starlink introduces a critical vulnerability in the chain of custody for operational data. This dependency shifts the authority of data validation from the US Space Force to private corporate entities like SpaceX. Consequently, the speed of decision-making under JADC2 is bottlenecked by the proprietary algorithms of non-state actors rather than sovereign military command.

This operational friction manifests during multi-domain exercises like Project Convergence, where data ingestion from heterogeneous sensors often fails to reconcile with legacy tactical data links like Link 16. The resulting latency forces commanders at the US Army's Future Command to choose between unverified automated target recommendations and slow manual verification processes. Ultimately, the vulnerability lies in the translation layer between commercial API standards and military-grade cryptographic protocols, leaving the JADC2 network architecture highly susceptible to Russian electronic spoofing.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If the US Space Force remains dependent on commercial constellations like Starlink for tactical data transit, how can JADC2 maintain a secure chain of custody during high-intensity electronic warfare operations?

The current trajectory indicates that JADC2 will likely rely on zero-trust network architectures and dynamic encryption keys to secure data transit over commercial networks. However, the operational reality of Project Convergence suggests that the processing overhead of these security layers will inevitably degrade real-time targeting speeds. Consequently, commanders may be forced to accept higher security risks on networks like Starlink to preserve the tactical speed required for multi-domain operations.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here