U.S. and Israel are planning for a possible attack on Iran, source tells NPR

NPR | Daniel Estrin, Hadeel Al-Shalchi, Ruth Sherlock

The U.S. and Israel are preparing plans for a possible attack on Iran in early November, after the U.S. midterm elections on 3 November, a person briefed on the war planning told NPR. Israel had initially planned a mid-October strike before its own elections on 27 October, but President Trump objected. The U.S. is amassing forces in the region.

Preparations could also pressure Iran toward a diplomatic deal. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran is ready for diplomacy or war. An Iranian security source warned of retaliation against U.S. interests and assets of participating countries if officials or civilian infrastructure are hit. The conflict began on 28 February with U.S. and Israeli strikes that killed Iran’s supreme leader and senior officials. Iran has blocked the Strait of Hormuz and targeted vessels; the U.S. has blockaded Iranian ports and oil shipments. U.S. strikes have reduced Iran’s air force, air defences and navy, yet Tehran still threatens Gulf states and has struck U.S. bases. The Revolutionary Guard has threatened data centres and underwater internet cables under the Strait. On Thursday it targeted seven oil tankers there, with four catching fire and three hitting naval mines. The IMF reports contractions of around 16 percent for Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar this year, with Saudi Arabia and the UAE also in recession, and projects oil at $130 a barrel in 2027 if disruptions continue.

Comment

The early-November window after U.S. midterms places force amassing in a dual role. It keeps an attack option open while the same deployments can serve as leverage for talks. Iran’s stated readiness for both diplomacy and war leaves the practical effect dependent on whether the posture produces a deal or simply raises the cost of continued Hormuz disruption.

That disruption already carries second-order economic weight. The IMF figures for 16 percent contractions in Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar, plus recessions in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, show how shipping and energy shocks transmit rapidly through Gulf budgets. A further round of strikes would intensify the same channel rather than open a new one.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If force amassing after the 3 November midterms continues to serve both attack preparation and diplomatic pressure, which function would weigh more heavily once Iranian threats to undersea cables under the Strait of Hormuz are factored in?

The pattern suggests the dual-use posture retains more leverage as pressure than as a trigger for immediate action. Cable and shipping threats raise the cost of any new strike round for all parties, which points to continued calibration rather than a fixed early-November decision.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here