Top Chinese general invokes Jiang to highlight importance of loyalty in military

South China Morning Post | Xinlu Liang

China’s most senior general Zhang Shengmin invoked former president Jiang Zemin’s response to the 1991 Gulf War and the Soviet collapse to reinforce absolute Communist Party control and ideological purity over the People’s Liberation Army. Writing in the People's Daily, the Central Military Commission vice-chairman highlighted Jiang's historic rejection of military depoliticisation while emphasizing technical modernization over troop numbers.

This ideological consolidation comes amid ongoing high-profile anti-corruption investigations that leave only General Zhang and President Xi Jinping on the military command body. Historical precedents established during the 1990s, including slashing 500,000 personnel in 1997 to fund advanced computer-guided weaponry, navy, air force, and space programs, serve as the operational framework for current political rectification campaigns. The military transition replaced traditional conscripts with technical specialists and established emergency mobile units designed for deterrence across the Taiwan Strait. As the armed forces approach their centenary next August, Beijing aims to accelerate transformation into a world-class force while maintaining absolute political loyalty.

Comment

The Central Military Commission's dual emphasis on ideological purity and technical modernisation reveals a structural tension within high-tier command networks. By framing anti-graft campaigns alongside the 1997 reduction of 500,000 troops, senior leadership asserts that political loyalty is a prerequisite for operating complex automated warfare systems. This operational framework conditions command authority on party discipline rather than purely professional military competence.

In high-intensity maritime operations, this centralised party oversight creates friction in split-second tactical decision-making across Eastern Theater Command assets. Subordinate officers navigating radar-guided missile engagements in the Taiwan Strait may face hesitation if command autonomy conflicts with rigid political loyalty metrics. Consequently, the Central Military Commission's anti-graft purging risks stifling initiative among middle-tier commanders handling joint-force network architectures.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If the Central Military Commission continues prioritizing political vetting over tactical autonomy, how does that balance affect operational initiative among Eastern Theater Command officers during rapid maritime joint-force engagements?

The available evidence points toward a structural trade-off where political reliability guarantees party control at the direct expense of decentralized battlefield responsiveness. My assessment is that middle-tier commanders operating in complex electronic warfare environments will routinely defer operational decisions upward to avoid political vulnerability, introducing critical latency in multi-domain command chains.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here