Winning the war is not enough to permanently secure Israel's survival and security

Jerusalem Post

Israel faces a critical strategic juncture where military success against Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas must be translated into durable, long-term security outcomes. While the IDF has effectively degraded enemy infrastructure and command capabilities, these tactical victories remain insufficient to guarantee national survival without a comprehensive political framework. Military operations can neutralize immediate threats, but they cannot replace the necessity for robust, enforceable security arrangements that prevent future rearmament and territorial encroachment.

Historical precedents, such as the failure of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 to contain Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, underscore the danger of relying on diplomatic promises lacking credible enforcement mechanisms. Consequently, Jerusalem must prioritize sustained intelligence cooperation, integrated regional missile defense, and the freedom to act unilaterally to ensure that current battlefield gains are not squandered. True victory requires preventing adversaries from rebuilding their missile, drone, and nuclear capabilities while ensuring the permanent return of displaced citizens.

Comment

The reliance on kinetic degradation without a corresponding political end-state risks repeating the cycle of attrition seen in previous conflicts. Effective long-term containment requires the establishment of a persistent surveillance and interdiction architecture capable of disrupting the illicit supply chains that fuel proxy rearmament. For India, this underscores the necessity of integrating advanced persistent monitoring capabilities into its own border security doctrine to mitigate the risks posed by non-state actors operating within grey-zone environments.

To read in details click here