How Al-Shabab Beat the Peacekeepers

Foreign Policy | Mohamed Gabobe

Al-Shabaab militants have successfully exploited the phased drawdown of the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia to reoccupy critical territories and intensify asymmetric attacks across the Horn of Africa. This security vacuum exposes the systemic vulnerabilities of the Somali National Army, which remains plagued by severe logistical deficits and unresolved clan rivalries.

Over nearly two decades, international partners poured billions of dollars into AMISOM and its successor, ATMIS, yet failed to build a self-sustaining local security apparatus. The insurgents maintained operational resilience by establishing a highly effective shadow administration that out-taxes the federal government. Somalia's security forces cannot hold ground alone. This vulnerability invites disaster. With the transition to a new African Union Support and Stabilisation Mission in Somalia threatened by regional disputes between Ethiopia and Egypt, the militant group is poised to expand its influence and destabilise East Africa.

Comment

The security vacuum created by the phased withdrawal of ATMIS forces exposes the structural inability of the Somali National Army to maintain territorial control. Without the heavy artillery and air support assets previously provided by Ugandan and Burundian contingents, local forces remain highly vulnerable to Al-Shabaab's concentrated infantry assaults. This operational deficit is particularly acute in rural sectors of Lower Shabelle, where isolated outposts lack rapid reinforcement capabilities.

Consequently, the planned transition to the successor AUSSOM framework will likely inherit a fragmented security landscape where defensive lines are pushed back to urban centres like Mogadishu and Kismayo. This contraction of the government's security footprint will inevitably disrupt local intelligence-gathering networks, allowing Al-Shabaab to expand its tax collection apparatus across the Jubaland corridor. The resulting financial windfall will directly fund Al-Shabaab's procurement of commercial drone components and advanced dual-use electronics through illicit maritime trade routes in the Gulf of Aden.

Strategic Question for Discussion

If the transition to AUSSOM fails to secure dedicated funding for air support assets, how will the Somali National Army adapt its defensive doctrine to counter Al-Shabaab's infantry tactics in isolated sectors like Lower Shabelle?

The historical pattern of Somali military operations suggests that without external air assets, the national army will likely abandon forward positions in favour of consolidated urban garrisons. This defensive consolidation would cede rural transit routes to Al-Shabaab, forcing local forces to rely on sporadic, high-risk convoy operations for resupply. Consequently, my assessment is that the military will increasingly depend on ad-hoc alliances with local clan militias to maintain a nominal presence in contested districts.

Share your assessment in the comments below.

To read in details click here